_zn02

6 ms·

1.
by _zn02 3y ago
I don't think it's unreasonable to complain about HN not having the same functionality that every other social media site has.
2.
by _zn02 3y ago
I answered that in my original post: "I understand that there are other options (reset password to random gibberish, run a script to delete my comments[, or, third option I'm inserting now, which seemed obvious to the point of no
3.
by _zn02 3y ago
Just told you, there's no delete button.
4.
by _zn02 3y ago
Some version of "these comments are a donation to the community and the idea of taking your ball and going home is anathema to what we are trying to build here" which is a long way of saying "we think our shit don't stin
5.
by _zn02 3y ago
For some value of "just fine" https://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-twitter-documents-ad-... Not that it's worth much but I recently deleted my Twitter account (and then a few weeks later, also, my Reddit ac
6.
by _zn02 3y ago
According to the FBI, 18 U.S.C. § 1030 proves you wrong, and I'm going to believe fbi.gov over anonymous HN commenters 99 times outta 100. Even if you think you're right because you think some part of the law is unconstitutional,
7.
by _zn02 3y ago
I think it explains the why quite clearly- editorial independence. It's a big deal. NPR is allowed to be critical of the US government in a way that RT is not.
8.
by _zn02 4y ago
If it's a progressive plank, surely you can provide an example of an actual progressive politician making the argument, yes? Instead of two private, non-elected people, that no one who doesn't have an agenda to push has ever hear
9.
by _zn02 4y ago
no, not like that fellow you didn't name and made an unbelievable and unsourced claim about
10.
by _zn02 4y ago
What do you mean? According to the sources I'm reading- not this paywalled one, of course- the lawsuits allege the presence of asbestos in their talc, detected in-product by the FDA as recently as 2019. Are you saying that was intent
11.
by _zn02 4y ago
They detected the incident on the 29th of December. I kinda think that regardless of what day they disclosed, from that day to today, people would find various reasons to complain- "to soon to know what happened", "the day b
12.
by _zn02 4y ago
I mean...surely you're aware that, at this time, already, there are many people committing non-violent crimes, and being sentenced, and not being incarcerated, right? Punishments include fines, travel restrictions, wage garnishment, l
13.
by _zn02 4y ago
Yes, I think that non-violent offenders should not be sent to jail, and I think that we should only punish people for what we can prove in a court of law.
14.
by _zn02 4y ago
They're already out of top sport by virtue of not being able to compete against people who are actually at the top of the sport. Really we should be coming up with better ways to divide "top sport" than gender. Weight class
15.
by _zn02 5y ago
Immigrants: you don't get to choose where you're born. Dual citizenship seems similar. I see no particular reason to consider "allegiance to the government" as a matter of trustworthiness, barring actual treason. Job
16.
by _zn02 5y ago
You were always allowed to kick Nazis out of your bar, it's just that now the bar is extremely easy to get to from your home
17.
by _zn02 5y ago
See, that statement makes me think you haven't fully considered the ramifications of this decision. If a dude wearing full Hugo Boss Nazi regalia walks into my private establishment, I should not have to serve him, and I refuse to res