_red

21 ms·

151.
by _red 6y ago
Well "OpenAI" is itself a bait-and-switch of a name (nothing open about it). So, it fits.
152.
by _red 6y ago
"OpenAI" == Orwellian DoubleSpeak Its literally one of the most closed projects in existence. The fact they call it "OpenAI" is an insult.
153.
by _red 6y ago
I dont have an answer, but could be for same reasons why hospitals keep it on the cooler side: Less fungal / bacteria growth. Less mites, insects, bugs, etc.
154.
by _red 6y ago
The merchants of war and division thank you for helping in this effort. The censors aren't stupid, of course they are going to go after the David Dukes first, then over the next decade watch how the internet slowly transforms into a ma
155.
by _red 6y ago
Saying blacks deserve to be a protected class is pretty racist you know.....
156.
by _red 6y ago
You fail to see whats coming next. In 1997 the big tech platforms lobbied that not only they wouldn't censor views, that it was basically impossible for them to do so. This is what allowed the internet to grow without onerous regulatio
157.
by _red 6y ago
I LOVE this new internet you people are creating!
158.
by _red 6y ago
I know, lets pretend like we know nothing about fraud / security and say "vote by mail" is a solution...
159.
by _red 6y ago
I love the name "OpenAI" for something kept closely guarded and tightly controlled. Perfect Orwellian double-speak for our new internet.
160.
by _red 6y ago
No. Although the name is "OpenAI" there is very very very little open about it.
161.
by _red 6y ago
Yes, Buffets long-term shtick has been "grandfatherly simpleton". He intentionally plays that up for maximum effect. What I find interesting is that now Gates is aping Buffet in that regard. Gates now exclusively appears wearing
162.
5G Technology and induction of Coronavirus in skin cells(pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
7 points by _red 6y ago|2 comments
163.
by _red 6y ago
Yes, but Stanford says the CFR for those under 70 is 0.04% https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v...
164.
by _red 6y ago
>turn around times my company tried to outsource a ancillary product we develop in 2011-2013 timeframe. It wound up being non-viable and we brought it back in-house. I think many don't see how pernicious turn-around times can be. Th
165.
by _red 6y ago
Because often the way these things escalate is police are called because protesters are burning and looting... This is my point: The presentation of this list inherently absolves one-side from any misdeeds.
166.
by _red 6y ago
Yes, its not surprising that big business wants it. But it is surprising how many "progressives" have been co-opted into F100 talking points, who they claim they oppose.
167.
by _red 6y ago
Donald Trump was a democrat for most of his life. The basic tenants of secure borders + protecting american jobs was basically the Democrat platform for most of its existence.
168.
by _red 6y ago
But ( ding ) why ( ding ) dont ( ding ) you ( ding ) like chatting ( ding ) ? ( ding )
169.
by _red 6y ago
Further, the author wants us to be outraged of "how entirely simple and legal this is". However, why should the Federal government get this land at all? We used to have allodial title many years ago...but then it became common-law
170.
by _red 6y ago
There something more going on. In the past 3 months the following narratives have been pushed by the MSM: 1 - Trump is a racist for suggesting that borders should exist 2 - Trump is liable all covid deaths for not closing the borders fast e
171.
by _red 6y ago
HN is usually pretty good at detecting insecure implementations and obvious attempts at subversion. I wonder whats wrong in this case?
172.
Linus Torvalds Switches to AMD Ryzen Threadripper(phoronix.com)
3 points by _red 6y ago|0 comments
173.
by _red 6y ago
This somewhat a classic Strategy vs Tactics problem: The best Strategy is to do nothing The best Tactic is the complex array of shutdowns, mask, social distancing, pharmaceuticals.
174.
by _red 6y ago
The sun will eventually burn out, asteroids will continue to hit, plagues will continue to come....the entire universe will ultimately end. It always seems that those who fetishize "environmental conservation" don't really ap
175.
by _red 6y ago
>because they're a monopoly They're not a monopoly.
176.
by _red 6y ago
>You're not well informed about the book and that makes your comments pretty painful to read I accept that. But I'm commenting on the article that OP linked which quoted Gibson.
177.
by _red 6y ago
>I don't see this as a pathetic premise. You might agree with the politics of it which could be clouding your vision (I'm not intending that as anyway critical). Sometimes it's helpful to view it from another angle: Imagin
178.
by _red 6y ago
>[2136 book idea]....a world in which 80 percent of the population has been wiped out by climate change, but also a world where characters time-travel to create an alternate past in which Clinton won the election. This is strange on so m
179.
by _red 6y ago
>widespread testing of the population So you mandatory test everyone and determine that 28% of the population has been exposed to the virus. Now what?
180.
by _red 6y ago
> 20 look at my reaction to world who is the "my" you are referring to? you have an 'a priori' conflict.

More ›