_pjee

4 ms·

1.
by _pjee 4y ago
Thanks for the interest and feedback everybody. I won't be seriously having conversations about this or working on it until summer.
2.
by _pjee 4y ago
Given I'm going to take a completely different approach that doesn't use anything proprietary, and non-competes aren't enforceable in California, I'd assume this is ok?
3.
by _pjee 4y ago
Yeah I was thinking the same thing.
4.
by _pjee 4y ago
I was looking into that, looks like they have an API but it's limited to 10k requests per day, and TOS says you can't blend the results with other sources.
5.
by _pjee 4y ago
Nice! I was just hoping to beat regex scrapers.
6.
by _pjee 4y ago
Pefect. I joined, thank you.
7.
by _pjee 4y ago
I'd imagine the search engine of the future will be like that. Let a summarization AI do the search and then report back on results, with citations.
8.
by _pjee 4y ago
I think one issue is broadness. When a user issues a query there is often a choice of 1) low quality material that directly answers the specific question, or 2) high quality material about the subject more broadly. If someone asks "how
9.
by _pjee 4y ago
If it's useful it isn't a gimmick.
10.
by _pjee 4y ago
It depends on your goal. If the focus of your search engine is question answering (like Google), ChatGPT is serious competition. Browsing the web to discover online communities and niche websites is an entirely different activity that ChatG
11.
by _pjee 4y ago
Been hearing a lot about Kagi on here, might reach out. My concern is that they're trying to beat Google at its own game by being better at scraping, document understanding and question-answering.
12.
by _pjee 4y ago
Hacker news doesn't have dm right?
13.
Laid Off from Google Search?
118 points by _pjee 4y ago|76 comments