_osud

4 ms·

31.
by _osud 7mo ago
>it at least is something that happens as part of a judicial process Only sort of, because some countries have very weird ideas of what a "judicial process" is. >I'm certainly more comfortable with it than being subject
32.
by _osud 7mo ago
Yeah, but you also have Hungary who can decide to do things the same way they're done in Sweden and Finland.
33.
by _osud 7mo ago
I'm not advertising the US here or trying to troll. I'm an European pointing out things about the European system that many here will not have thought about. >It's a complete false equivalence. ICE agents have straight up
34.
by _osud 7mo ago
>This isn't a point against EU services compared to the US In the US the cops actually need a search warrant signed by a judge. In the EU they only sometimes need one. >Should we be moving to Singaporean services? Oh shit, simila
35.
by _osud 7mo ago
Is there really? Governments routinely go against the ECHR and the ECJ, and do nothing to rectify past violations when ruled against. On a national level, sure.
36.
by _osud 7mo ago
I strongly suspect the use of "luxury" here has more to do with the text being written by an AI than OP being confused.
37.
by _osud 7mo ago
How comfortable are you guys with the fact that EU countries allow prosecutors and sometimes even police officers to issue their own search warrants without meaningful judicial review? Some EU courts will not exclude illegally obtained evid
38.
by _osud 7mo ago
In America the normal term is "European", not "luxury". It would be somewhat odd to specialize in both American and European luxury cars. It'd be significantly less odd to service a RR and a BMW 3er next to each o
39.
by _osud 7mo ago
This is an LLM generated slop post.
40.
by _osud 7mo ago
>DDoS is not an acceptable response in any jurisdiction Who the fuck cares about what the law says? Seriously. The service archive.today offers is illegal in any case. This is just a fundamentally bizarre context to be bringing up the la
41.
by _osud 7mo ago
No, pschastain has malware on their computer. I just hit a ratelimit on another account I was using, and decided it'd be funny if I replied from their own account.
42.
by _osud 7mo ago
Archived page from 2014 gets tampered with by this javascript from 2022: https://web.archive.org/web/20220912152218/http://echobanner... Unless you're very technical, web.archive.org is completel
43.
by _osud 7mo ago
I don't think your logic stands up to the most basic analysis: It's unarguably easy to demonstrate the public benefit generated by archive.today, we use the links here on HN to bypass paywalls every single day. Please demonstrate
44.
by _osud 7mo ago
What do you want me to address? I'm just pointing out that there are no great archival services, and the only real alternative to archive.today is worse. >Pay attention to this type of behavior, folks. It's revealing What does