_kbh_

17 ms·

181.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Because it was Russian for almost 200 years before Khruschev stole it from Russia and 'gifted' to the Ukraine. And it was ottoman for how many years before that?. Nothing was stolen from Russia, I know Russia has a lot of his
182.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Atrocity propaganda is great for eliminating opposition at home. It doesn’t win you a war, though. And it bears repeating: the thing about wars is you actually have to win them. That’s not an answer to the question, then again I don’t
183.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> lol now this question is being asked? now? as much as i appreciate your wishful thinking, this conflict is beyond the scope of reason, and the interests that have propelled us back into the Cold War (more like Luke-warm War) want it th
184.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> If you think it through, the only reasons this “I’m a pacifist but” dime store morality can be entertained at all is because of the idea that Ukraine is winning, and because Western audiences (and to an extent even Ukrainian) have larg
185.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> The earliest I am aware of is June 2020 (some small patrol boats) In 2017 the US sent javelins to Ukraine. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2017/12/23/us-officials-say-lethal-...
186.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> But we're escalating pretty rapidly. A year ago we were "no lethal aid", now we're giving Ukraine F 16s. I don't know who the 'we' is in this scenario but the west has been giving Ukraine lethal aid e
187.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> 1. Russia is highly unlikely to lose. It doesn't look like they are going to occupy all of Ukraine any time soon, which we know was their primary goal based on the accidentally posted victory article on TAS. > 2. Ukraine was p
188.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Still -being a realist- hoping that Ukraine quickly yields so we don't end up in WW3. How many of your family members would you trade for your realist views?. How many of your brothers, sisters, nieces and nephews would you happil
189.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> I should be a required viewing for all enthusiasts of escalation of conflict with Russia Yes because Russia would rather end the world and itself then lose, that's a position the people all the way up the command chain to launch t
190.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Is there any legitimate source for this other than random bad actors or anecdotal propaganda from western news source. The UN has documented it pretty well. > This isn't a 10th century Viking invasion. Nope but what Russia is d
191.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Am I right in thinking that the PS4 and Xbox One (and later) consoles and should be easier to emulate by virtue of being based on a more standard x86 architecture? Easier to emulate to a working state, but potentially harder to emulate
192.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Putin, like UBL before him, is not comfortable with The West "encroaching on his area." He, again like UBL, openly expressed his concerns along with warnings, and was ignored. Eventually as they say, the rest is history. If t
193.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
You never answered the question, I'll pose a similar one but my guess is you will never directly answer. If someone came to your house, raped your child, castrated your bother and was occupying your kitchen. Would you given, you have t
194.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Ukraine is piss poor compared to Russia. If this is true for all of Russia why do they keep stealing toilets?.
195.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Why are people cheering for war? People are cheering for stability once Ukraine is in NATO, Russia will no longer be able to try and subjugate them again and overall region stability will increase.
196.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Ukraine has lost over 12,000 troops just recapturing 50 square miles of territory. This numbers dont seem like they exist in reality. > Bloodshed needs to end I agree! Russia must leave Ukraines 1991 borders and never come back, im
197.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> What nukes? That’s a strange question. Are you asking in good faith? You’re asking me to tell you which specific nukes? Can you tell me what the choices are here? Is there a kind of nuke that is acceptable to host at the missile “defen
198.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
HAHAHAHA. You are something else. Like a pot calling a gray cat black, doubling down on hypocrisy. I will respond point by point but rarely have I seen such a slam dunk. > 1. You are repeating white house talking points... 2. You asked m
199.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> First, the most one-dimensional and simplistic answer. With regard to everything except Crimea: yes of course, and the internationally recognized Minsk II agreements should have been implemented. Why except Crimea?. Crimea was invaded
200.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
I’ll respond to this, once you answer this question and answer it directly without taking about America for paragraphs. Do you think that the Russian army should withdraw from Ukraines internationally recognised borders, this includes Crime
201.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
You can make super small hello world binaries if you try. https://nathanotterness.com/2021/10/tiny_elf_modernized.html has a 120 byte hello world program for x86_64 ELF.
202.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
I see no care from you for the Russian cluster weapons they are being pointed at populated civilian areas intentionally. > instead of speaking with each other to work together to resolve it. This is Russias doing more than anything, but
203.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> try being more intellectually honest! You would have to redefine both the words "intellectually" and "honest" for to fit even within the same realm of what you are doing. You have already admitted that you intention
204.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> They’ve already placed anti-nuke installations in Romania and Poland Where and what?. > that can be retrofitted to launch them What can be retrofitted to launch what nukes? > and now Poland wants nukes for their planes. Yes becau
205.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> in moral terms the issue is a bit more complicated, because the rest of NATO is a signatory to the CCM This is not entirely true a large amount of NATO is a signatory to the CCM but there are a few members that aren't outside of t
206.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> Pretty sure your opponent committing war crimes doesn’t mean you get a free pass to commit war crimes. Using cluster munitions is not a war crime. Intentionally targeting civilians with cluster munitions on the other hand is. I don&#x2
207.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> I'm not sure what your point is. Are you implying it's justified because Russia is using them? What I think they are saying is there no reason to get worked up over cluster munitions in Ukraine because they already are. The m
208.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> You are still my favorite clown, don't worry. No need to stalk my comments. Typical Vatnik when they have no way to counter an argument, remember the Internet Research Agency says attack the person not the content.
209.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
Why do you care about AZOV you're more than happy for the Russians to give a billion dollars to a guy with literal SS lightning bolts tattooed on him. Seems like you're more then happy about Russian nazis but looking to very much
210.
by _kbh_ 3y ago
> In the US the major cities have police budgets of between $200 million and $5 billion Yeah and most didn’t have this capability generally considering both the costs and the little amount of use you'd have for it. You'd expect

More ›