_kbh_

55 ms·

601.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
They likely sell them instead, and make a lot more money than they would have at pwn2own.
602.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I would like to see some sources for these claims if you have any.
603.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
If you think Russia is doing okay then why did they even start mobilisation at all?, surely the hasty mobilisation is a sign that the war is not going the way that they expect. The tanks that they are sending don't even use the same am
604.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> It's the same for any form of aid. For example, an NGO source on the ground in Ukraine said that before US auditors showed up (6 months later), only 30% of the US hardware made it to the frontlines. [1] This is simply not true and
605.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Objective to the truth is who, go find a retraction from them for anything regarding the war, or go find a single article of them calling out Russian war crimes we have caught on camera. Speaking on the credibility for Russian “news outlets
606.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> “ Alignment with Kremlin and Beijing interests"? Care to provide some evidence? They hire a lot of people that used to work for Russian state sponsored propaganda outlets and have a harshly pro Russian view of the Ukraine war with
607.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I don't think it's that simple I think you are right on the money. The Russians have too many times just gone back on their word or broken international agreements just because it favoured them.
608.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> The guy is funding Starlink for Ukraine out his own pocket (or at least was last I heard). You hard kinda wrong, it's a bit of a wash, but USAID paid a significant amount of the cost for starlink. https://www.washington
609.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> It that was truly their goal, they could’ve carpet bombed their targets day 1. Russia doesn't have the capability to do this or they would have, Ukraines air defense is too much for Russia to even obtain air superiority after 9 mo
610.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Knowing stuff like this is table stakes for participating in the discussion. See, for example, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-tape/leaked-a ... This does not claim at all what you think it does
611.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> We have tape recordings of US state department officials deciding who will be in the Ukrainian cabinet and who wont. of what their policies can and can't be. If you could provide a source for this, that’d great. > One phone cal
612.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> It is only by weighing of the lives of the people in the conflict at zero that the U.S. justifies prolonging this proxy war and continuing to arm and subsidize Ukraine. Ukraine is literally fighting for their sovereignty, America is he
613.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Did you miss the part where they literally actioned requests from both parties?.
614.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> A big fan of the American war machine huh? Big fan of it when it arms a country against its imperialistic neighbour that is doing its best to try and obliterate a country off the map.
615.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> As I said, some sort of negotiated settlement is the way 90% of wars end. Proposing such is not "pretty much exactly what Russia wants", especially when Russia already occupied about 20% of Ukraine before February. A negotiat
616.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> It is true that you are not the one who constructed the backstory of "Buying Twitter + publicly stating that the Ukraine War might not end with Ukraine winning 200% of its goals = 'problem with natsec'", but it does
617.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> I'd rather America does not provoke Russia and have a military presence bordering Russia and not support Ukraine joining NATO. Appeasing Russia will never work, they have appeased for decades and it just leads to more conflict. Th
618.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> The USSR fell in 1991 and the Russo-Georgia war wasn't until 2008. If you mean the South Ossetia conflict, that was an internal conflict by separatists that had some Russian assistance, much like Ukraine is getting NATO assistance
619.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Did you miss the part where it was driven by “connections” and 97%+ Twitter employee donations were to Democrats? I find it hard to believe that 97% of people at twitter donated to _anyone_. I think your misinterpreting the data, the d
620.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> NATO is an anti-soviet alliance from the Cold War era. We’ve been fighting proxy battles with the Russians for 80 years. Think about that! Why on earth would Russia trust us Americans and our “defensive” missile systems? Because NATO,
621.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Sure, and before that? NATO has been expanding since the USSR fell. The year the USSR fell, the Russians invaded Georgia. So conveniently, Russian imperialism has existed since practically as soon as Russia existed. Maybe if Russia sto
622.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> This mentality is was created the Cold War and has cause immense international damage throughout history. This mentality is born from reality, Russia has agreed before to never even threaten Ukraines sovereignty, let alone actually inv
623.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
https://www.reuters.com/technology/exclusive-ukraine-halts-h... > WASHINGTON, March 11 (Reuters) - Ukraine's two leading suppliers of neon, which produce about half the world's supply of the key ingredient
624.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> No, the Ukrainians are not going to service radars, helicopters, drones, tanks that they have no idea about and were just given. They are also given training including maintenance training on the weapon systems they are using. It'
625.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
I dare say the people servicing the weapons in a war zone in Ukraine are going to be the Ukrainians. Ammo is coming from everywhere, either stock piles or other countries when appropriate. And to the Ukrainians this is altruistic, the Ameri
626.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/1505946734345994241 This is a very weird source, of course US defence manufactures stocks go up when the US buys a lot weapons for other countries, its a huge investment i
627.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> Calling them antifascists seems a misnomer too, they seem to me to be actually anti-capitalist rabble-rousers and professional rioters. Educating, equipping, funding and inciting violent riots seems a clear TOS violation to me. So I ta
628.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> If Russia is bargaining with Iran trading "hundreds" of captured anti-tank weapons and guided artillery munitions... it doesn't take a genius to come to conclusions as to what other non-state affiliated actors are doing.
629.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
Did you respond to the wrong post?. > Chechen War has nothing to do with Georgia/Ukraine/NATO/etc. It's a different conflict. Yes, but it's just another example of Russia being imperialist and invading other coun
630.
by _kbh_ 4y ago
> It is also not the US’ place to send Billions of Dollars in “Aid” to Ukraine. It’s a Ukrainian issue, and the US should have left it at that, but it didn’t because the US saw an opportunity. An opportunity to help prevent a genocide by

More ›