_karie_

4 ms·

1.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
> "Yes you are citing my link... " Wasn't sure you actually read the information in that link. > "which is pure speculation." Is it? > "Do you have anything to actually add?" Given your temperamen
2.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
> Again, I don't know the details so I cant say who is in the right You are unsure of the details, so you instinctively choose to align with the $3T corporation. Further you assert the responsible discloser is "unhinged" f
3.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
OpenAI apparently launched "Silent Memory Preflight", which functions as an internal self-audit of "hidden user memories" including an undisclosed knowledge memories layer[1]. [1] https://aiweekly.co/aler
4.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
Wait no further. It's already happening. One reason why a "logs are all you need" solution may fail: untrusted-log-as-injection[1]. Check those SBOM, and don't forget to include their CICD pipelines[2]. [1] https:/
5.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions
6.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
“False analogy” isn’t a counterpoint, it's a deflection. What part of the mapping breaks for you?
7.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
ahh, the "what was she wearing" comment.
8.
by _karie_ 4mo ago
Any malware or LLM with user-level filesystem access can attack the outdated KDF [1] and/or wait for Firefox to be running with an unlocked credential store and read the decrypted passwords from Firefox's process memory. [1] http
9.
by _karie_ 5mo ago
Neural plasticity definitely matters.
10.
by _karie_ 5mo ago
Incorrect. Adding LLMs in the browser IS the backdoor into your computer.