Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_greim_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
421.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
My assumption was that JS bitwise misses the advantages of speed and space-compactness of bitwise in other langs, since you only have 64 bit floats to work with, thus forcing conversion to int and back for any bitwise stuff. I haven't
422.
▲
Show HN: Use Reverse Proxies for Rapid Prototyping
(gist.github.com)
2 points
by
_greim_
11y ago
|
0 comments
423.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Personally, I'd like to see a US constitutional amendment more or less along the lines of: > Any law that isn't routinely and consistently enforced is invalid. ...since in my view unenforced laws don't do anything except i
424.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
> the critical point for TypeScript will be 1.6 with async/await Is that the official plan? I ask since async/await will presumably be going into the actual JS spec, so I'd expect engines to hold off adding support except
425.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
My guess is that much of it comes from technologists and futurologists, who are over-represented online, and way over-represented on Reddit and HN. Perhaps we've even filter-bubbled ourselves a little bit here. In any case, the relat
426.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
> how does this meaningfully expand on the JavaScript ecosystem Moving from callback-based programming to generators + promises is like going from burning logs in dirt pits to gas stovetops. A build tool that incorporates it successfully
427.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
I'm glad people are pushing the envelope on JS build tooling, and not giving in to the "we need to freeze the toolspace now" contingent. I feel like the mainstream build tools have been interesting, but nobody has got it all
428.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Case in point which tripped me up recently. Knowing that promise.then() callbacks aren't called synchronously[1], even if the promise is already resolved, I assumed that this: var tick = Promise.resolve(); async function cpuB
429.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Is "@inject(HttpClient)" ES6 too? I don't recognize it but I haven't memorized all the new capabilities yet.
430.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
I think that's the plan. Whatever the committee can agree on and ratify by December 2016 will be dubbed "ES 2016" and so on.
431.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Depending on the browser, lots of things are already implemented, either generally available (e.g. `Promise`) or behind flags (e.g. fat arrows). This announcement just accelerates the adoption pipeline by reducing worry about spec changes.
432.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Do NOT run to the nearest weight room and start doing squat weights in response to your back pain. Go see a physical therapist. They'll put together an exercise routine that's customized to you, and ease you into it. Address the c
433.
▲
Google Identity Platform launches
(developers.google.com)
4 points
by
_greim_
11y ago
|
1 comments
434.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
This is nothing new. High-end investment firms absorb many top computer science grads every year, sometimes even pulling them away from their PHDs, but it doesn't seem to raise many headlines.
435.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
My worry is that with JavaScript-based stacks evolving so fast these days, monied interest in one way of doing things would ultimately be incentivized to suppress better ways of doing things, as they emerge.
436.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
> Censorship should be the subreddit's decision. It's fun to watch parallels develop between reddit site operators versus subreddit moderators, and federal government versus state's rights. (For anyone not familiar with th
437.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
Given that browsers, Node, and JavaScript are all rapidly evolving, lots of churn in the library and framework space is what I'd expect to see happening, and I'd argue should happen. The problem is bigger than just the rate of c
438.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
> But Facebook's founder Mark Zuckerberg said it was "not sustainable to offer the whole internet for free". I think that's exactly what they should do, if they're serious about this: just find a way to offer eve
439.
▲
by
_greim_
11y ago
If you would just set me and my friends up as dictators, then we'd build a faux democracy and call it totalandcompletefreedom.org. Soon, everyone will benefit from the fake freedom and realize how amazing it is to
440.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
> you can't have parallelism with one CPU What about multithreading? If a single core switches between tasks I can see that not being true parallelism, but what about multi core?
441.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
Gun laws are different from the things in the article, since they take away a freedom instead of adding one.
442.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
First first world problems.
443.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
> How did you do one file at a time? I suspect they just flipped a switch causing all files to be run through the transpiler, regardless of filename extension or anything. However at the time the switch was flipped, none of those files a
444.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
Building programs that generate cellular automata is a fun exercise in any programming language, even if it just spits out ASCII art.
445.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
> I honestly can't see it staying king once browsers can support other languages. Well browser support for other languages will only come in the form of things transpiling to JS or subsets of JS. It seems unlikely that whole other r
446.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
I think the article makes a good point. Counter-point: at least in the open source world, popularity can translate into lots of eyeballs on the code, lots of bug fixes, better ability to hunt down solutions on Google, hire people, etc. Coun
447.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
> It's cool, I just don't understand why everyone is so excited about a simple syntactic improvement. async-function-star is a pretty interesting concept that it at least theoretically makes possible; AKA being able to both yie
448.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
I think there's a weak echo of this concept that plays out in an election. Except swap in the inconvenience of voting for giving up the $1,000 box. On the one hand, why bother voting? It's a pain in the ass and my single vote has
449.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
> nobody really wants to get to the bottom of this Don't confuse "nobody takes my speculation and anecdotal stories seriously" with "nobody wants to get to the bottom of this."
450.
▲
by
_greim_
12y ago
I'm also trying to wrap my brain around what webpack is , since I've been thus far conditioned to think of the build runner (e.g. gulp) and the bundle maker (e.g. browserify) as being separate. The article seems to be saying this
More ›