_frip

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by _frip 7y ago

   Great point. I would happily follow the rules and I do. Evidently though, the other person went ad-hominem with a very aggressive reddit-esque comment on a simple reply I gave. No one chimed in to flag that comment so I had to speak for mys
2. 2.▲
   by _frip 7y ago

   Haha 'one click away', I see nothing that proves your original comment, the burden of proof lay upon you (when the argument was active). That's quite a jump to conclusion too. But whatever helps you sleep at night while accep
3. 3.▲
   by _frip 7y ago

   Well looks like I'm blind because I find no mention of the national security act in the sources you linked as well. You're trying so hard. Oh well..
4. 4.▲
   by _frip 7y ago

   That is exactly what happened.
5. 5.▲
   by _frip 7y ago

   Pretty interesting comment. Let me see a reputable source which backs up 'anti pm message arrest under national security act'. I googled those and found just one arrest in a state which said > Asked why Shinde had been suspende