Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
_a_a_a_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
391.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Science doesn't have a way to know when it has finally stumbled upon such a permanent theory though. It doesn't need to and I didn't claim it was trying to (especially as it's impossible as you correctly point out).
392.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
That exactly describes the groping towards 'a more correct model'. Which is towards the truth, surely? If not then what?
393.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Bloody hell, there go a few hours. Thanks for that (somehow both sarcastically and not). https://web.archive.org/web/20190327161227/http://www.lolcat...
394.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
On February 22nd, 2008, YouTuber Ted Suzan posted a video entitled "I accidentally a piano bench; is this dangerous?" https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-accidentally
395.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> A program can voluntarily set itself to low priority if it is waiting for a spin lock What does this even mean? How can a program do this when thread priority is an OS thing? It's seems just weird.
396.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I can't speak for this particular editor, but Visual Studio once shipped with a mode for C# I think it was, that was like a neon light show. It was unbearable. Also SSMS it has full-on intellisense or nothing at all, and having it on;
397.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Well fuck them.
398.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
It's deffo 4 for me. I can see 4 in one shot, if it's say 5 or 6 or a bit higher I have to split the group and subitise each then sum them. YMMV and your mileage beats mine :)
399.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> and several window panes appeared to have been warped by the thermal heat that's the worst kind of heat. They were lucky.
400.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Or a phone-home keylogger
401.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I worked at a small company in London and got treated the same way: feeling left out, excluded. It took me a bit of thinking before I realised it was actually being done for my own benefit , as I was a contractor there. Had they invited me
402.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I think I am unclear what you mean by branch coverage. I assumed it means ensuring that every 'then' and 'else' branch is taken? But if so, that means every statement must get covered, right? Put another way, you can onl
403.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Excellent answer, thanks
404.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I'm also a professional dev and I 100% agree with you. Clever code is a trap. Clever coders… Well, pretty much a disaster IME. KISS
405.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
interesting. > where developers misunderstood the precedence of operators, particularly > unary operators like !, + and typeof. if (!whitelist.has(specifier.imported.name) == null) { return; } which is exa
406.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
That's fine (if you document it). Repeatability may mean 'repeatability over the same program instance/minor version/major instance'. It's fine if you're clear. But ISWYM too.
407.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Are you saying PEGs can't conflicts and ambiguities? I didn't know that.
408.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
why do you believe that? Can you explain why not?
409.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Name another language where random() is deterministic pretty well all of them, surely? eg. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/rand-t... "For a specified seed value, the resu
410.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I would say that's a bug in the RNG, nothing to do with any determinism issue
411.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Links to these whopping bugs pls? I also don't think you've justified why determinism from a seed is a bad thing.
412.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
go on....
413.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Ahem? "Spin is a widely used open-source software verification tool" and it's been around a long time "The tool was developed at Bell Labs in the Unix group of the Computing Sciences Research Center, starting in 1980, a
414.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
> Aunt Sophie is addicted to meth and now uncle Leroy got himself arrested again Does this reflect your actual life experiences or an invention? Because a lot of htis sounds like made-up whingeing. > The real world for kids is awful,
415.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Can you elaborate? TIA
416.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I'd be shocked at the child's behaviour, the parent's infinitely more so. Jesus.
417.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Just turn it off. You will get a short period of withdrawal then you'll get the world as it is. I did, and while I miss some stuff, I'm better off. Don't blame "I'm hooked". It's down to you.
418.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Exactly. And I don't understand parents who give their kids unrestricted access to the internet (inc. on desktop machines) then expect the government to regulate what the kids see. Take some responsibility like these parents.
419.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
I've no idea what you're talking about. My point was edibility of fruit.
420.
▲
by
_a_a_a_
3y ago
Why? It's relevant here surely.
More ›