Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
__s
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
__s
2mo ago
One group I followed switched to LinkedIn
32.
▲
by
__s
2mo ago
It doesn't, it just loses your session
33.
▲
by
__s
2mo ago
Haha, I was reading your comment as praise for Greg until the end
34.
▲
by
__s
2mo ago
Seemed to've worked out pretty well for Uber
35.
▲
by
__s
2mo ago
Yep. For managed postgres our threat model is to assume vm is compromised. It's paid off, just earlier this year there was RCE fix in PG 18.4
36.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Every year I just say I want to improve my work life balance & work out more Doesn't happen, but hey at least I'm being honest about what I'd like to improve
37.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Or just order any macropad
38.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
I find it irritating with humans. "last but not the least" always distracts me as I then consider maybe the last item _is_ the least. & what is with everyone saying they want to "double click" into meeting items
39.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
you encode information in the token, this was a motivation for postgres to remove 32 byte cap on tokens: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/508d0505-8b7a-4864-a68... See from slide 26 https://www.pgevents
40.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Yes, https://www.pgbouncer.org/config.html#section-peers
41.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
SO_REUSEPORT[1] pretty much does all we want in kernelspace vs unnecessary userspace hop inbetween. These all run on same VM 1: https://lwn.net/Articles/542629
42.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
If it weren't for those bone spurs maybe that war wouldn't be so forgotten
43.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
B-roll
44.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Silent execution of tremor was a pain in the ass trying to upgrade to nextjs 15 / react 19: https://github.com/tremorlabs/tremor/issues/148
45.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Yes. & in the end my experience has been that you can write low latency code with gc, but only by expending more effort than it'd take to use manual memory management
46.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Fable's spatial reasoning is much better. Over the weekend I had opus looking into a blank textbox issue[1] which it was spinning on for a few minutes, switching to fable immediately fixed But yeah opus often the better workhorse given
47.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
I've experienced the opposite: wishing I were dead so life wouldn't go on with me falling into just another glum existence. That at the emotionally present moment I snapshot it, preventing inevitable dullness that time moves on Un
48.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Haha I'll be lucky if I can gather 2m & still have sacrificed much work life balance just because my type of stupid is an obsession
49.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
> I have yet to see a program that silently handles allocation failures and doesn't crash Postgres handles allocation failures
50.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Sai is https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=saisrirampur Maybe we were saved by being acquired before hiring sales. Sai knew the problem & understood customers. He'd sometimes oversell a bit, but managed it: kept p
51.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
I did at peerdb
52.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
You don't need to be charitable, Snowflake laid off technical writers citing AI to replace them: https://snowflake.help/snowflake-layoffs-2026-technical-writ...
53.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
& ClickHouse has managed Postgres in open beta (which I work on)
54.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
I'm on 128GB ram strix halo, bought framework desktop for a few thousand CAD back when everyone was calling framework desktop overpriced
55.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
If you're running pg yourself I recommend pgbackrest. It doesn't run as a daemon, & it forks multiple processes for concurrency. But it's simple to run as archive_command & is light on resources outside concurrency wa
56.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
tbf it took 4 years since PG15 support was added for me to fix remote BASE_BACKUP support & wal-g base backups being inconsistent on PG15+ (parameter typo had pg_backup_stop return before wal archived far enough for consistency) https:
57.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
indeed, wal-g actually started as a port of wal-e which was Python: https://www.citusdata.com/blog/2017/08/18/introducing-wal-g-... wal-g was a much larger improvement over wal-e. we're optimizing t
58.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
in reality no, for the sake of the analogy, yes
59.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
Correct. We tune overcommit so postgres reliably returns out of memory. It becomes complicated to accurately tune overcommit for every AWS instance type. We configure GOMEMLIMIT/cgroups but those are about RSS. Outliers come together:
60.
▲
by
__s
3mo ago
no. but wal-g & wal-rus both have parallelism over wal-e. however are you more asking about handling build up of wal / vacuum prevention caused by long running transactions? those are up to postgres, archive command only keeps push
More ›