Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
__jal
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
421.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
I find it troubling that the CEO of Cloudflare would attempt to deflect their culpability for a bug this serious onto Google for not cleaning up Cloudflare's mess fast enough. Don't use CF, and after seeing behavior like this, don
422.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Does anyone with a strong understanding of internetworking, peering and transit not see the difference between QOS for technical reasons and things like zero rating? It seems a lot of people are invested in muddying the difference.
423.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Why are so many questions about the background of people displaying knowledge in this thread? That is what I'm finding disturbing. I don't know anything about nerve gas, but do know about a couple topics that I suspect would tri
424.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
I think you're conceptually close, but wrong. My money's on something like this: https://techdocs.altium.com/display/DMAN/Design+Data+Managem... Edit: much better link than the above: http://w
425.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Whining self-pity is usually bullying jerks' other go-to mood. I honestly don't expect their behavior to change. I no longer use Uber, although this is a useful post - I never got around to actually deleting the account.
426.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
I don't have a pet precisely because I try to see things from its (theoretic) perspective. I love cats, and would have one in an instant if I were home more. But as it stands, the poor thing would just be locked in a boring house by it
427.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
> it's expected that they'll be a team player and provide support in whatever way possible The way I read it, it sounds like they tried that and found the approach didn't work. So they moved on to "tough love" an
428.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
There's a certain (supposed) billionaire who wants a big wall. Not quite as inspiring to me personally, but, well, tastes vary, I guess. Also, he's planning to spend your money on it, not his.
429.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
And the legacy energy companies are still raking billions in subsidies every year, even before you get to things that aren't counted that way. And the industrial farmers are still subsidized to grow various things. And FedEx has a huge
430.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
That's just not possible to authoritatively state. The best you can do is "this shouldn't normally cause a noticeable impact on most systems". As just one example, what you're stat()ing over NFS with a busy, flaky a
431.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Not a windows person, so I can't speak to how the directory is treated, but I've watched enough people run applications from the Downloads directory to wonder about it.
432.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
That may be the rule for particularized searches (I don't know one way or the other), but "papers please" road checkpoints are common[1]. U.S. citizens are theoretically not required to show papers. In practice, theory and pr
433.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Your argument is that privacy and security stances for web browsing should be driven by what is appropriate for the 10-and-under crowd?
434.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Can you describe what is "knee jerk" about HTTPS everywhere? It sounds like you're saying that you believe HTTPS is a bad solution to (presumably) the problem of surveillance-friendly plaintext comms via browser. But I'd
435.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
A righteous rant.
436.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
You appear to be confusing the message archive limits with the number of user limits. The first is (loudly) disclosed. The second, apparently not.
437.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Again, I see point of disagreement, other than an odd bit of defensiveness about ORMs.
438.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
About 10 years ago, when I learned about the EURion Constellation[1], I made a T-shirt with the pattern on it. It sort-of worked - a photo taken at the right distance would frequently cause a copy machine to refuse to copy it. It was twitch
439.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Unless my reading ability is broken, we seem to be agreeing. I said I have never seen one that doesn't have one. My point being that ORMs can't fully replace SQL, and the proof is they all provide an escape hatch.
440.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Someone seems to write one of these every few years about whatever the flavor of the month is. I recall reading one from sometime in the early 2000s about Hibernate that read the same way. And another one for one of the Perl ORMs before tha
441.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
I know it is not currently impossible, but I don't trust that the current "policy" will continue. Personally, not talking about virtual GPUs. (I mean, that's cool stuff, but that's not my use case.) I'm glad yo
442.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Yeah, Nvidia rather sucks at cleaning up after themselves, for whatever reason. The main reason I'm not buying another card from them is their stance towards Linux in general and their stance towards PCI virtualization in particular. I
443.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Don't forget the infamous NOP bug that made all the headlines in the late 90s, when certain values of NOP would actually do something.
444.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
That's less a scheme than a market. Governments can, in fact, create them, if they throw enough of (our) money at the idea. And people were saying that 10 years ago (and properly-scaled versions of the same quite a bit earlier). James
445.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
> What's the benefit of decentralization? No single point at which to apply judicial- and/or rubber-hose cryptography is the big one. I do agree that the problem-space of attempting to make a reasonable UI for GPG has been expl
446.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
> I don't want to start a flame war, but if the BSD license allows for them to do this, why is it morally wrong? I can legally walk down the street cursing at everyone I meet. I can try to learn things about people, and then use tha
447.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
pf's syntax is much easier to reason about than, for instance, iptables. I find myself writing tiny little scripts to emit iptables syntax from something resembling a pythonic-pf, just because I make fewer mistakes when dealing with it
448.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Yes. I know two functional junkies. One was born into a lot of wealth, the other isn't insanely rich, but is comfortable and no longer has to work. Your last sentence is exactly right. Neither of them will ever face legal action. But t
449.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
> Because we have the capability to work beyond that capacity now in most cases. That's like asking "why shouldn't we allow horses on our highways?" Horses on highways would cause accidents. I have yet to see a fast-m
450.
▲
by
__jal
10y ago
Of course. Facebook (or Google, for that matter) isn't magic, just in possession of a really intrusive nose for others' business and the war chest to do something about it. Detectives, private or otherwise, are sometimes very skil
More ›