_28jh

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by _28jh 6y ago

   String s = null; That's not possible with nullable types. The whole point of nullable types is to mark types that can be null. So this is possible: String? s = null; But now it's not much different than this:
2. 2.▲
   by _28jh 6y ago

   "Blockchain-based vinyl bootstrapper, written in Rust"
3. 3.▲
   by _28jh 6y ago

   I've seen this article reach the front page many times and I laugh every single time. There's too many golden lines. > First communication became digitized and free to everyone. Then, when clean energy became free, things start
4. 4.▲
   by _28jh 6y ago

   Yet somehow it seems like Mozilla is going in a worse direction than ever.
5. 5.▲
   by _28jh 6y ago

   I hate when I ask something about globals on SO and I get the same blanket answer. Why does every programmer feel the need to tell me that "globals make it hard to reason about the state of your program?" Unfortunately most system
6. 6.▲
   by _28jh 7y ago

   A really weird way to end a comment.
7. 7.▲
   by _28jh 7y ago

   Everyone knows that. It's also literally the point of the machine.