Zurrrrr

18 ms·

151.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
What massive MAC framework does FreeBSD has? Last I heard SELinux was attempting to be ported (SEBSD) but that was never finished? The 'different/other/ ways to secure the system are inferior since they offer no protection if
152.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
"secure by default" by OBSD basically just means everything disabled by default. Can't hack anything if nothing is running, right? Only issue is it's not that useable either.
153.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
> New users are recommended to install all of them. That's kind of bullshit though. If someone has plenty of experience with *nix OSs then OBSD isn't that strange, and a 'new' user asking a reasonable question should
154.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
For me personally as a non-corporate use, I use it to encrypt my laptop and not require a password to need to decrypt. This is deliberate as I protect my important stuff again with VeraCrypt. The reason for the automatic login via TPM is ha
155.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Saying "of course there is..." in response to someone asking if an obscure oss OS has support for a new hardware feature seems odd.
156.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
OpenBSD's default configuration has basically nothing running. Once you actually set it up for a use case, it isn't much better (you'll likely be running software you would on Linux that wasn't audited) and might even be
157.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's not just a pseudoscience, it's a cult.
158.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
> "I teach... rocks how to ehm... throw... other rocks. Which I know, there's an ethical issue to that. Like, would humans just be allowed to throw other humans? No! But in rock culture, well you gotta rock as a rock. Naturally
159.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I'm older I guess because I saw that in my 20s and couldn't take it seriously. Agree a lot of sci-fi might have something like that though and I would have been more forgiving of stuff when I was younger, and was for stuff I did l
160.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
You're welcome :)
161.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Just a note, but the movies from the other guys are a bit different Resolution and the Endless are more lovecraftian (which is why I got into them). Something in the dirt is similar to synchronic but I didn't like it as much, and it&#x
162.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's specifically the idea that it is based on the idea that we only use 10% of our brains, which is utter bunk. I can't see it as anything but fantasy because of that. I agree the idea of a drug that could turn us into super inte
163.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Limitless is more fantasy than sci-fi IMO.
164.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I was hooked the firs time I saw it, but I love time travel and like the movies the other guys who made that made. I also like that it was a very small scoped movie in that it was basically one guy doing experiments in trying to figure some
165.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
He said in some places. Countries have different rating systems and PG-13 doesn't exist in many.
166.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
If he likes Asimov he might like more philosophical/political stuff. - Maybe stuff like: The Time Travelers Wife Raised by Wolves Gattica 12 Monkeys Coherence Solaris Artificial Intelligence Donnie Darko Minority Report Needle In A Tim
167.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I can't ever imagine switching from vi at this point. It's what I know and matches the unix philosophy of do one thing and do it well. I can easily run shell commands as I need to without it interrupting my work flow. Why would I
168.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
20 years from now programming as we know it today will be a very specialized field and not necessary for most things, and language discussions will be a thing of the past.
169.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
If I was going to replace coreutils, I think I'd do it with the ones rewritten in rust.
170.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No.
171.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
You seem like one of those insecure types who need to have the last word, so it's all yours buddy. Enjoy, and I hope you get whatever feeling it is you're seeking by doing so. Best of luck to you in life kiddo. Cheers.
172.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
lol, ok champ.
173.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
That makes sense. Thanks.
174.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Thanks for letting me know.
175.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Why would finding out you were related to a figure from history at all change how you would view that history?
176.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Thanks for your input.
177.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No, I'm not talking about subjective experience at all. ALL that happened was that I made a generalization, and other people wanted to contest it because, well, they could. It's not more complicated than that. It's basically
178.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Got it. Do you though? I doubt it.
179.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
If I'm understanding you correctly, there are some things revealed by science that seem to match some kinds of ancient knowledge, but that could easily just be coincidence.
180.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Just curious, but are you on the spectrum? Or an ESL speaker? Context makes it clear which claim they were asking for. In any case, I'm not providing a source. This is a somewhat commonly known thing, and I was speaking from personal e

More ›