ZoF

27 ms·

151.
by ZoF 10y ago
>Indian govt is working to get all villages better sanitation facilities. Exactly. The privileged here don't understand that this is being actively worked on in India. We will be a superpower within the next 10 years and will be de
152.
by ZoF 10y ago
>Microsoft's fade into irrelevance Come on now...
153.
by ZoF 10y ago
Lolita isn't a very common term outside of *chan.
154.
by ZoF 10y ago
>Safe spaces do not stifle free speech. A space where you can't say certain things doesn't stifle free speech. Care to explain?
155.
by ZoF 10y ago
>It's funny to see people get bent out of shape at the idea that they might have to watch what they say I strongly believe in free speech and I will absolutely be 'bent out of shape' when people or groups try to stifle it.
156.
by ZoF 10y ago
This comment makes zero sense in this context. The parent poster said he was for defending free speech, why would he want to switch places to somewhere where it's restricted? What is your objection even? That because free speech is res
157.
by ZoF 10y ago
Sure, that doesn't mean that arbitrarily defining things as 'hate-speech' and censoring them completely for everyone is the right solution.
158.
by ZoF 10y ago
That's $3.00
159.
by ZoF 10y ago
>Not working for governments, of course Why? That's pretty naive.
160.
by ZoF 10y ago
Isn't the entire premise of batsh that it compiles to bat? Why would you need to install batsh?
161.
by ZoF 10y ago
Heh, I don't know why it's at all surprising but I, for some reason, expected there to be some kind of restrictions regarding TLD ownership/providership. I really dislike this, that a single entity owns a TLD when they don&#x
162.
by ZoF 10y ago
Yes, sorting that way does show that currently Germany doesn't have the largest immigrant population, but that is changing quickly. Today Germany is the second most popular migration destination in the world, after the United States[0]
163.
by ZoF 10y ago
Ah so it's nature _or_ nurture now? It must be completely boolean?
164.
by ZoF 10y ago
Yeah a huge number of frameworks do, as well as handcoded php sites. I work at a hosting company, really hoping this PoC is more complex than is implied in the post. So few people actually patch/update their boxes with any degree of re
165.
by ZoF 10y ago
I actually used to respect you. You disgust me by what your profile quotes. Enjoy your existence at the expense of others.
166.
by ZoF 10y ago
Trigger warning: There is text below this text. Heh, I laughed. Interesting to see where HN draws the line on 'offensive'
167.
by ZoF 10y ago
Where are you getting 10 calories per day per pound? I find that surprisingly low, and that's even if we're talking 100% sedentary here.
168.
by ZoF 10y ago
How can you say that with such certainty? People who feel fat don't want to have sex as often. You don't think that's true? Note: I said people who _feel_ fat, not people who _are_ fat.
169.
by ZoF 10y ago
Gender doesn't really matter but in the comments the author states 'I'm a KDE _girl_ myself', blogger profile has 'gender: female'.
170.
by ZoF 10y ago
Yes, but that's not explicitly mentioned in the article and is expected given that it's targeting a specific platform. You could say the same of OSX. fwiw I've been using various flavors of linux for years(CentOS/Arch&#x
171.
by ZoF 10y ago
This is awesome; funny that having Windows XP actually protects you from ransomeware in this case.
172.
by ZoF 10y ago
Genuinely surprised anyone could read my original comment as anything other than sarcasm. Who says churlish. Meh. Maybe it was a troll. Well deserved downvotes.
173.
by ZoF 10y ago
Anyone care to substantiate these downvotes? It's ok for the parent commenter to say all American's are anti-environmental and have 'issues defending the environment' but it's not ok for me to defend the original op
174.
by ZoF 10y ago
Agreed, I can barely stand those churlish wasteful Americans and their unwillingness to offer our environment it's well deserved 'amenities'. Nevermind that the parent poster wasn't saying anything negative about this po
175.
by ZoF 10y ago
This site's down, 80/443 both closed.
176.
by ZoF 10y ago
You're doing this too much. Downvoted.
177.
by ZoF 10y ago
>especially given these guidelines are years old for the most part. What part of the guidelines being old makes the outrage '[very] artificial'? Seems valid outrage/annoyance to me, and I didn't artificially manufactu
178.
by ZoF 10y ago
Do you go on the /chon/ much? It's an extremely common topic across boards
179.
by ZoF 11y ago
What? That's an odd tangent. He never implied there are famous secretaries.
180.
by ZoF 11y ago
Didn't you just agree with him but substitute 'hard to solve' with 'computationally intractable'? Yes based on our understanding today these things are computationally expensive (e.g not feasible), but they could th

More ›