Zamicol

44 ms·

1. 481.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   That's 10^8, not 108. You made me check the definition of a galaxy.
2. 482.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   How do we know that gravity is constant in proportion to mass and not a function of time? General relativity tells us mass slows down time, but we assume slowing down action doesn't affect gravity. If gravitons, or other quanta of gr
3. 483.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   Where are you going? Where can Internet refugees go?
4. 484.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   What non-profits?
5. 485.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   Node breaks on me all the time.
6. 486.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   >With specific commit hashes you can verify the the version you are building with in production is the exact same code as the one your security team audited prior to release (assuming git has fixed its hash collision vulnerability) Can w
7. 487.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   >"incredible amount of compute power to generate a collision" That article sets the "best case", not the worse, and that article is "old". The GPU/ASIC industry is bananas, and we have no idea what oth
8. 488.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   No, don't do that. Git's gpg signing function signs the commit hash, which is SHA1. Until git uses something other than SHA1, this is insecure. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/02&#x2F
9. 489.▲
   by Zamicol 9y ago

   Even then it doesn't matter because you are signing an insecure hash.
10. 490.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    I would argue it is. I cannot use git's built in functions for secure applications. If git was meant to be used only as Linus describes, then this should not be possible as it is not secure: https://git-scm.com/book&#x2
11. 491.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    >gay couples being able to have genetically descended children What steps are missing? I'm extremely interested in this but I've had a hard time finding more information.
12. 492.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    I would never use that. It uses SHA1. The problem is the hash, not the signing. A secure package identifier doesn't necessarily need to be signed. Conversely, you must have a decent hash algorithm. Your mentioned method signs the g
13. 493.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    I really feel like git having a secure package identifier built in is the right answer. I haven't heard any news of git moving to SHA3-256. Why shouldn't this be built in? Here's an old thread from 2017-03-04: https:/&
14. 494.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    Yes. A price drop will result in hardware going offline, meaning the difficulty should drop.
15. 495.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    I'm getting a stripe error message when I try to donate.
16. 496.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    Sources?
17. 497.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    No, it's unspecific, leaving the reader to assume.
18. 498.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    It's not an ethereum bug, it's a parity bug. Ethereum worked exactly as coded.
19. 499.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    And the red light bill with a head scratcher veto. https://www.colorado.gov/gov-hickenlooper-vetoes-%E2%80%9Cre...
20. 500.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    And it was organically and democratically determined.
21. 501.▲
    by Zamicol 9y ago

    PoW needs to die. PoS can be superior to PoW in every way except the problem of initial wealth distribution. PoW solves this problem elegantly. PoS currently has no meaningful alternative to this distribution method. What Ethereum is doin
22. 502.▲
    by Zamicol 10y ago

    I have a T420 and finally just updated to a Dell E5470 (8V22N). All of Lenovo's offerings seem overpriced as with the industry as a whole.