YouAreMammon

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   They just don't make em like they used to! yells at cloud
2. 2.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   And how did you come to find out that the defendant didn't do that? That would explicitly be not included in the record.
3. 3.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   Why wouldn't they? If the company is healthy the dividends paid will reflect macroeconomic inflationary processes. I don't think "you don't want to beat inflation?!?!?!" is a good faith interpretation of what I&#x27
4. 4.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   For starters, most attorneys won't allow their clients to utter a single word to law enforcement or on the court record. Your proposal is that the client has to have enough of a grasp on the legal strategy related to self-incrimination
5. 5.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   Thank god that isn't the bar for ineffective assistance of counsel. A vast majority of defendants don't know all the ins and outs of law... that's why we have a profession to deal in this domain. Asking the average defendant
6. 6.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   Again, that's with the mindset that the reason to own shares is because they're an appreciating asset. If you study the history of what investing in a company via shares has historically meant, you'll find that it's only
7. 7.▲
   by YouAreMammon 11mo ago

   Quite so. Like most things, balance is required. Short term vs long term profitability is underappreciated in today's CEO class.