Yokohiii

11 ms·

241.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
And those tools regularly burnt cities to ashes. Took a long time to get it under control.
242.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I think you get him wrong? He is already concerned about "bash on steroids" and current tools add concerning amounts of steroids to everything.
243.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I like it a lot, I find the chat driven workflow very tiring and a lot of information gets lost in translation until LLMs just refuse to be useful. How does the human intervention work out? Do you use a mix of spec and audit editing to get
244.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
The example is really lean and straightforward. I don't use coding agents, but this is some good overview and should help everyone to understand that coding agents may have sophisticated outcomes, but the raw interaction isn't mag
245.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
That is why I am currently looking into building my own simple, heavily isolated coding agent. The bloat is already scary, but the bad decisions should make everyone shiver. Ten years ago people would rant endlessly about things with more
246.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Custom payment schemes are late stage profit generation. It requires hoards of salespeople or an AI that can actually do math. It's just how hyperscaling works. You are not wrong, but in the wrong timeline.
247.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Those yottabytes of VRAM are also consuming electricity constantly.
248.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Not sure what you are referring to, no one said that?
249.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Very valid. My comment was fixated around the fact that big tech has the addiction to have subscriptions for everything. It's common that you provide generic subscription plans for the masses and supply "call us" custom plans
250.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I recently tried to create markdown like parser, I had to refer a lot to common marks. What I saw was madness. I never knew from casual use, that markdown is so complex. There is literally zero thought about parsing, it forces natural looki
251.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I don't know YAML well enough, I never liked it. But if you want to write an halfway common marks compliant parser, then markdown is just nuts. It is just way too complicated for the simplicity it conveys. Look at lists, they can be fr
252.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
The distinction between hard and soft RTOS explains my confusion. Thanks for the heads up!
253.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
It is priced incorrectly, but that is intentional. You can't create a tiered paid plan for the whole world that fits everyone. You can't create nuanced extra plans to satisfy all the outliers. It's an bet to keep the customer
254.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I have no practical insight on RTOS in general, if anyone bothers to give me a hint, please. From all what I've looked into, RTOS does mean to create software systems that are almost perfectly predictable and safe to execute. Predicta
255.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Not sure if you want feedback on this, but mine is free. The lists are impenetrable for my eye, I think an key mistake is that you don't use an accent color for titles in lists (i.e. look at a google serp). That you don't directly
256.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Interesting. Each time I think about how we could reboot the (social) web I have this on mind. I don't want exposure to everything, so kind of whitelisting the contacts/peoples/blogs is the first thought. I guess it could wo
257.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
| "network:fetch" // ctx.http is available (host-restricted via allowedHosts) | "network:fetch:any" // ctx.http is available (unrestricted outbound — use for user-configured URLs) | "r
258.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
The crate says it uses SIMD, but the crate also says that content search is 20-50 times faster. Maybe the guy unsure how fast it is or how much speedup he should claim to get recognition.
259.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
If you have arguments, then make them. This is just saying stuff for the sake of it.
260.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
> I'm guessing that a lot of cynicism here is coming from ...the fact that CF just dumps tokens to generate some slop to compete with the single biggest web platform and casually adding a vendor lock in. It's just buzz, an inex
261.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
> d) deployment story is php levels of easy Yeah just invalidate the SSR cluster for your tiny footer update and let it prewarm until coffee break. Easy.
262.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
> One issue is that you don't write Go code, you write Go plus some templating language (like html/template or go templ). Not being able to seamlessly move from regular code and template code adds friction and is limiting while
263.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Most coders are familiar with javascript. Javascript has the largest community. If you want to be popular, then JS or rather TS it is. But it's correct that it is odd. As long the lang is mainstream enough, it hardly matters. My assump
264.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
because there is more human effort
265.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Another downside of a large stdlib, is that it can be very confusing. Took my a while how unicode is supposed to work in go, as you have to track down throughout the APIs what are the right things to use. Which is even more annoying because
266.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Sheet Ninja is 108 USD / year and has tiny capacities for every metric. SQLite is free and would stomp this in every aspect on low budget hosting. Even a tiny API that stores CSV would be magnitudes more efficient. But what would scare
267.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
> If I were Google, I wouldn’t release research that exposes a competitive advantage. Isn't that a classic tit for tat decision and head for a loss? Excellence and prestige are valuable too. You get those expensive ML for a small di
268.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Detachment from reality. Code elegance is more important then anything else. As simple as that.
269.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
> "chalk": "^5.6.2", security.md ist missing apparently.
270.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Bad decision making. Lack of code ownership. Absence of confidence. Is what made this exaggerated cost even possible. Or: the peter principle.

More ›