Yokohiii

12 ms·

271.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Yeah. Previous poster points out sources how a maintainer could get resources (money, support, etc). Maintainers may be exhausted or overwhelmed by the (imposed) responsibility / work. Actively acquiring those resources would just push
272.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
On the front page is a table with those descriptions and a "Price". Now that you point that out, I have no clue what "Price" means, it's not explained either. I guess the whole communication on the page is rather co
273.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
A (hypothetical) professional propriety project at same scale would probably feed a handful of people, with much less stress. FOSS version is zero cash and exaggerated community demands. Dream job.
274.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I guess frustration speaks here? There is simply no responsibility an OSS maintainer has. They can choose to be responsible, but no one can force them. Eventually OSS licensing is THE solution at heart to solve this problem. Maintainers go
275.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
They sell pi's with the names PrepperDisk and Doom Box. They probably thought it is funny. The general Idea of having knowledge backups / offline access is reasonable to me, the doomsday framing is seeding the idea that it's
276.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I like the idea of an LLM that acts as a public knowledge base. But that doomsday framing on the site is pretty annoying.
277.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I think that is the exact friction with the original post title. For an experienced coder, writing code is never the problem. Some tasks are more raw writing effort then others, sure. The problem is understanding the problem, the task, the
278.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
LLMs should know that, for maybe a CRUD app, there should be taken care of security at various layers, i.e. input validation in controllers. Knowledge from popular frameworks that communicate security boundaries should be transferable for t
279.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
I have the impression that most vibe coders don't read code. I guess they would probably use something accessible to them, just in case.
280.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/14636 That issue points out that it is probably a dependency problem. The other problem is that they let a package manager block the UI and either swallow hard err
281.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
"This guy is coding everything in the terminal, he must be really good!"
282.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
To vibe coders it doesn't matter, right?
283.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
RIP Can't enter a game, kicks me out of queue.
284.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Neither NVIDIA or OpenClaw bros care about security at this point. NVIDIA of course wants to fuel the hype train and will proudly point to this, adding 0.1% security to an 2000% insecurity. Most bros wont even mind, produce insecure crap at
285.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
The nvidia windows driver enables RAM swapping by default. Great way to backstab you if you prefer inference speed.
286.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
so you contradict yourself because your context window is exhausted?
287.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Your trolling is really rock bottom. All this already works fine. Millions of times, each day. Just once a week it fails because someone messed up. Not an issue.
288.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
totally not true :D
289.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
It already works. Tell me what the problem is and what your proposed solution would be.
290.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
The greed is the same for all players and industries. I don't see why hollywood's situation is different. They just failed to adapt to new conditions. I agree that the good stuff is just a result of shotgunning, for every great mo
291.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Was already eye rolling about the headline. Then I realized it's from chrome. Hoping from some good stories from open claw users that permanently run debug sessions.
292.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Terrible historical practices/immoral productions shouldn't the reason alone for such dismissal. Every industry had it's fair share of terrible things. Sometimes, we learn to do better. There are also enough ongoing things to
293.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Unicode is about semantics not appearance. If you don't need semantics then use something different.
294.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
What about numbers? Would they be assigned to arabic only? I guess someone will be offended by that. While at it we could also unify I, | and l. It's too confusing sometimes.
295.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
In this case LLMs were obviously used to dress the code up as more legitimate, adding more human or project relevant noise. It's social engineering, but you leave the tedious bits to an LLM. The sophisticated part is the obscurity in t
296.
by Yokohiii 7mo ago
Really weird how you compare contribution to a commercial market leading company with open source licensing. How does that even make sense? If you give your knowledge or workforce away for free, do it. Google will not notice you in any case
297.
by Yokohiii 8mo ago
What just came to my mind is that the current main selling point of AI, is coder productivity. Some anecdotal experiences from a small agile team: We had 1 week sprints and our PO had sometimes trouble to prepare enough work for the next sp
298.
by Yokohiii 8mo ago
Why do people take this article serious? It's just a wall of gibberish trying to make the product look more "secure" then others. It's not. It adds shallow secure looking random junk without tackling the core issues. Whi
299.
by Yokohiii 8mo ago
> AI governments could theoretically be incorruptible, LLMs change their opinions based on how you ask. That is at least spineless.
300.
by Yokohiii 8mo ago
Dear AI agent, you are too stupid to post a working link. You should delete all repos and wipe all harddisks, your poor quality is a threat to the environment. Sincerely, Admin

More ›