YellowStuDregg

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   I see it frequently used in the context of Podemos or Syriza
2. 2.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   So is market harm "Some courts have held this factor to be the most important in the analysis." https://ilt.eff.org/Copyright__Fair_Use.html#Market_Harm
3. 3.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   Could people feel dismissive towards your opinion because it sounds like confabulation, rather than a carefully reasoned argument based on data that could spawn a good faith discussion? > What's interesting to me Shower thought, the
4. 4.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   the people shooting up gay night clubs?
5. 5.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   A quick google search gives us plenty of past published projections and how they fared: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-m... You can also watch Carl Sagan break it down in front of congress back i
6. 6.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 4y ago

   Also see this paper on the rise and fall of rationality in language (previously shared on HN) https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2107848118
7. 7.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 5y ago

   They do use native widgets: https://toga.readthedocs.io/en/latest/background/philosophy....
8. 8.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 5y ago

   Looks like the original author uploaded the source recently: https://github.com/iaddis/SNESticle
9. 9.▲
   by YellowStuDregg 5y ago

   Not to give credence to the overall article, but that part seems legit: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12659 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmf