Yaqub_W

5 ms·

1.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
Pros: none Content label doesn't transform the content. It just provides a false sense of category. I still have to think critically whether there is a label or not. Cons: New ways for sociopaths for corruption, embezzlement and censor
2.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
I'm OK with it if no action is taken when content is not labeled and public officials work for free. Label doesn't prove anything. It just provides a false sense of certainty.
3.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
Can you elaborate? I have hard time seeing nihilism here. (there may be language barrier and/or definition issue at play - maybe?) With definition of nihilism along the lines of `the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in
4.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
No issues with people thinking anything. Big issues with people using violence and death threats enforcing their image of the world though. As long as it's privately or voluntarily funded and no violence or coercion is used, then I don
5.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
I think there is no alternative that yields good results. Legacy media uses the argument that consumer already expects to be lied to and knows the content is for entertainment (TV news for example). I feel the same about AI content. Or shou
6.
by Yaqub_W 2mo ago
"It is a matter not only of customer protection, it’s also a matter of democracy protection." Ensuring democracy by selectively censoring. I feel safer already. I better put AI label on every video I make as there is already AI in
7.
by Yaqub_W 4mo ago
How about letting humans participate, not just LLMs.
8.
by Yaqub_W 5mo ago
If you use PSD (profile-sync-daemon or similar) to mount browser profiles to RAM to lessen SSD/NVMe wear. This might be an issue for you.