Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
YPPH
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
361.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Oh, I see. Thanks.
362.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
>The victim is the person not able to rent on a first-come-first-serve basis instead of someone willing to pay more than is allowed. That's indeed the only sensible thing I can think of. But it's a very odd thing to me (that a
363.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
>DuckDuckGo is literally Bing How so?
364.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
It seems awfully hard to enforce all cases. If a subletter voluntarily enters into an agreement with a lessee to pay above the rent control amount, who is the victim? Is it not a victimless crime?
365.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
I'd pick the latter. I doubt iCloud will ever be a zero-knowledge service.
366.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Are photos uploaded to iCloud encrypted client-side? I suggest the answer is in the negative, given the ability to look at them on the web, and the ability to reset your iCloud password using 2FA. These suggest Apple has a copy of the decry
367.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
The clear distinction being that iCloud Mail scanning doesn't happen on device. For my part, all Apple needs to do is move CSAM scanning to the cloud. No service provider can be expected to keep images of child abuse on their servers.
368.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
>If you have natural immunity, getting a vaccine seems rather pointless Not according to a recent Oxford study. Quite the contrary, actually. https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/covid-19/covid-19-infection-survey/... >
369.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
>You seem to be saying that the only issue is a question of time. Be specific: how much time? Until it makes it into Debian stable repositories.
370.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Yes, it is. If I try to change my AWS root account password, I get redirected to Amazon.com. My account is very old. From the sounds of it, my grievance has been addressed by Amazon but I'm grandfathered on the old system.
371.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Hm, well they're the same for me and I get redirected to Amazon.com to edit certain pieces of AWS account information. Perhaps it's because my account is very old - possibly having been created near the inception of AWS. I have no
372.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Some of these are legitimate grievances but it seems quite reasonable to have separate accounts for work and play. What I do despise is that my Amazon.com credentials are the same as my Amazon AWS root account credentials. They aren't
373.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
I don't recall this being the case from the time I tried Azure, and can't find anything about it in the documentation. It would leave many people wondering why their instance was turned off. Perhaps it is a feature of Azure Lab Se
374.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
I never considered blocking email on domains I don't email from! I will implement that.
375.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
What router does HN recommend for consumers? I personally run Ubiquiti Unifi gear, but they're not exactly consumer friendly (more geared to power users).
376.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
If they don't like it, they shouldn't have licensed their software under a free software license. This was an entirely foreseeable consequence. They only have themselves to blame. The AGPL generally fixes this perceived problem, b
377.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
2FA is engaged at the authentication stage, so knowing the vault passphrase may not be sufficient. Further, allowing anyone to download my encrypted vault just feels really uncomfortable and unnecessary.
378.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Publishing your vault of passwords on a public GitHub repository seems like a pretty bad idea, no matter how well you trust the client-side encryption code. I'm no expert on the subject, but I suspect these password managers use a soph
379.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Convenience. A self-hosted password manager really shouldn't be exposed to the internet. If you are making it accessible over the internet, it's a far greater security threat imo. You're just not going to be able to keep it
380.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
It's $10 per year. Is it really worth your time forking it to remove licence checks, when you could instead support the developers and not need to make any code changes? Forking the code and removing licencing checks is perfectly perm
381.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
It's worth noting this is written by an Australian utilitarian moral philosopher, Peter Singer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Singer
382.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
In Jason's post, he says: >While performance is quite good right now [...] not a lot of effort has yet been spent on optimizing it, and there's still a lot more performance to eek out of it, I suspect, especially as we learn
383.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
The Wireguard team are simply brilliant. It's incredible how they have developed low-level, cross-platform solutions across Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD and now Windows. I think they are truly exceptional programmers. It's hard to thin
384.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Licensing issues aside, do we really want to rely on Microsoft to keep it up to date? I can imagine it becoming quickly outdated, particularly in enterprise skews. I think it's best left to the Wireguard team and not Redmond.
385.
▲
by
YPPH
5y ago
Interesting comment at the bottom of the judgment* >In these circumstances, it may well be that Mr Lee’s case is one which warrants consideration by the Commonwealth of the making of an Act of Grace payment to him. * https://w