YHK

3 ms·

1.
by YHK 5y ago
Yeah I saw that. It is a bummer, I want to take a look at it now. I will try to ask around to see what is happening there.
2.
by YHK 5y ago
I will admit, I am no patent expert. To my knowledge, you can patent the process, the molecule, the use of the molecule. I don't know exactly why they are all anonymous on 4 thieves vinegar, I assume it was because of patent stuff. It
3.
by YHK 5y ago
I forgot to mention it, but there is also FDA requirement to how we disclose the protocol. Usually it is patented process, so we are looking to see how we should do it to not create issue for the FDA validation. Other volunteer are working
4.
by YHK 5y ago
The four thieves vinegar is doing something like that ( https://fourthievesvinegar.org/ ) They work also on patented molecules and try to reverse engineer proces, and then publish it. (which makes it illegal, so they are anon
5.
by YHK 5y ago
It is a risk, I agree. I can assure you that there is work done in the lab, and that we plan to publish it, one way or another. I personally think that bioRxiv can be perfect to do a fast publication.
6.
by YHK 5y ago
Thank you. This is exactly what we are trying to do. It is difficult for us to get rid of the mad scientist label. We have a team in fact that evaluate the FDA requirement and looking at what would be the best way to do it. Also, Open IP me
7.
by YHK 5y ago
There is one plant for each big pharma. Eli lilly is in indianapolis. https://www.industryweek.com/expansion-management/strategic-... Novo Nordisk in Raleigh. https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/
8.
by YHK 5y ago
Hi, I am one of the scientists working on the project. We had a lot of discussion on the project about defensive strategies to avoid any issue, since we are dealing with a massive industry. We don't have a definitive protocol yet, so