Y0nash

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   I understand your point, but in that case why not to make that information public? All they had to do was to say on the website "We gonna rewrite TrueCrypt, stay tuned". Instead, we have this: "WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is not
2. 2.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   Jeez... nobody says he owes anything to anyone. Nobody said that people are pissed (maybe you are?) I think people are just disappointed because he destroyed something really valuable and he clearly hampers any attempts to recover that dama
3. 3.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   And you consider this a proper answer? Have you actually read the whole email? My personal opinion remains the same, but maybe let's just agree to disagree?
4. 4.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   Without commercial intentions he gives something for free, yet he forbids others from using it however they want. He also gave a completely vague reply to all the requests and arguments.
5. 5.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   I can see 3 possible scenarios: 1) Gov gave him "An Offer He Can't Refuse". 2) It's not him. He is either dead or in prison. 3) He is an asshole or mentally unstable.
6. 6.▲
   by Y0nash 12y ago

   Matthew Green https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/47872127131675852...