Xss3

10 ms·

31.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Human administration is not scalable.
32.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Most cheaters are playing well outside of human limits and doing huge amounts of damage to the legitimate player experience. A 10% safety margin beyond human play sounds reasonable. A world where cheaters can only play 10% better than human
33.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Then youve immediately made the cheater worse than the best players to blend in with them. Mission accomplished, cheater nerfed significantly. You wont even know theyre doing it.
34.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Yep
35.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Valve need to tweak the model so that it requires a higher confidence level before a ban, and to reduce false positives in their data capture methods. This is a mistake but doesnt kill the idea.
36.
by Xss3 10mo ago
You mustve missed the part where i spoke of consistency? Ive played at the pro level. Nobody prefires with perfect robotic consistency. I dont care if it takes 50 matches of data for the statistical model to call it inhuman. Valve has enoug
37.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Thats a win. Preventing cheaters gaining superhuman advantage significantly reduces their impact.
38.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Even randomisation would cause their aim to be statistically different to a normal players aim over time.
39.
by Xss3 10mo ago
There is no need for ML. Games arent the real world. A suitable game engine would have knowledge of when a shadow, player, grenade, noise, or other reactable event occurs for a given client. Especially if games arent processed in real time
40.
by Xss3 10mo ago
More like congrats, you just made every cheater far less effective by forcing them to play nearer to human limits. You arent eliminating cheaters, that's impossible, you are limiting their impact.
41.
by Xss3 10mo ago
If anyone is wrongly banned the system is too sensitive. Let it capture data for a month before banning someone. Ensure the confidence is crazy high.
42.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Good! Thats actually one of the goals. Reduce the advantage cheaters can gain to within human bounds. They can cheat to feel like a good player, but not a god.
43.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Anticheat devs could REALLY benefit by having some data scientists involved. Any player responding to ingame events (enemy appeared) with sub 80ms reaction times consistently should be an automatic ban. Is it ever? No. Given good enough dat
44.
by Xss3 10mo ago
The people that do the actual work dont want to be in the office surrounded by the slackers that for some reason 'require' other people around them to work. Theyre leaches. They drain energy me.
45.
by Xss3 10mo ago
If they fill your harddrive youre less likely to install other games. If you see a huge install size youre less likely to uninstall with plans to reinstall later because thatd take a long time.
46.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Have you?
47.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Any reasonable programmer (a peer) would say an unencrypted system that doesnt validate data is an unprotected system.
48.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Could you argue the computer was unprotected? No encryption is wild.
49.
by Xss3 10mo ago
80 chars per line was invented when languages used shortened commands though. Nowadays 120 is more appropriate. Especially in Powershell. Not so much in bash where commands are short, 80 can stay alive there!
50.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Id like to know about its failure modes. Does the fungus die when kept in less than ideal conditions? How quickly?
51.
by Xss3 10mo ago
Their demographics beg to differ.
52.
by Xss3 10mo ago
The fabs would be destroyed in such a situation. The wesr would absolutely play that card in negotiations.
53.
by Xss3 11mo ago
A good dev isnt necessarily a good writer. Summarising complexity concisely is difficult. Restrictions lead devs to write to useless messages like 'fixed a bug' rather than messages that are slightly verbose but actually useful. M
54.
by Xss3 11mo ago
Short is a relative term, and in this sense is relative to the long form explanation of the code. If a commit is sufficiently complex the long form could be 600 characters and the short form 200.
55.
by Xss3 11mo ago
I think i invented the phrase for that comment, pretty sure i havent seen it elsewhere
56.
by Xss3 11mo ago
Theyre an edge case warrior, best to ignore them lest you want to spend an age addressing every niche circumstance.
57.
by Xss3 11mo ago
I feel the result looks more like IV than an N
58.
by Xss3 11mo ago
Em dashes are still appropriate for articles, journals, scientific papers, and other academic or professional writing. In social media comments they came across as pompous even before LLMs and werent particularly appropriate for casual comm
59.
by Xss3 11mo ago
You want the ai aligned with writing accurate documentation, not aligned with a goal thats near but wrong, e.g. writing accurate sounding documentation.
60.
by Xss3 11mo ago
This comment was written by an AI specifically instructed to be more concise than usual.

More ›