Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Xelynega
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
211.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
An alternative viewpoint: Generative AI algorithmically processes the inputs such that they can be roughly recreated after decoding. A bit like how jpeg encodes images "beyond recognition"(aka lossy).
212.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I'm in this picture and I don't like it. Hours of trying to convince management that it's actually not OK to release a product that's completely built on open source software without even attaching an open source license
213.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Can't the same argument be used to say "lossy compression is not plagiarism". If I encode a movie with H264 there is no way to get it to output "exactly what was in the training data" and I can argue that "like
214.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
> Plagiarism is not related to copyright at all. The whole point of the free culture movement is reusing and remixing previous works. I can plagiarize something in the public domain I'd half-agree, but I don't think "break
215.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I think it makes sense. Plagiarism is literally taking someones work/ideas and passing them off as my own. If I were to read 100 NYT articles(one of which is about some event) and then write my own article afterwards that uses similar
216.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Professional accountability would be saying that companies like Riot can't deploy root-level code with no oversight onto millions of machines "for competitive integrity", not taking down git repos because they don't meet
217.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I think that's the opinion of the person replying to you as well. They're just using that as support for why they disagree with the EU rules, since it can be considered "commercial" even if you're making no money, j
218.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
When I talk to people that use copilot to improve their coding workflow, what I often hear is that copilot can replace boilerplate but not any business logic specific to the problem being solved. It sounds like you have a different experien
219.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Outperforming on the SAT(a test that the model was trained on) doesn't seem like a marker of intelligence as much as it is of recall.
220.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
We're training on text because that's what we're making the model do. It's a fact of neural networks that to train them supervised you need the training data in the expected input for(vector of n thousand preceding token
221.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Isn't 1 a point for their "skeptic" persona? If babies learn much more from much less, isn't that evidence that the LLM approach isn't as efficient as whatever approach humans implement biologically, so it's li
222.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
That's convenient. Typically one of the markers of good science is reproducability. How can we trust any of the information coming out of these studies if it can't be reproduced?
223.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
It's not about the size of the models, it's about the size of the training data. Humans are able to begin to generalize with a single persons experiences over less than a year, so the fact that LLMs cannot with billions of person-
224.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Don't have to imagine, same thing is happening right now with LLMs. I see "AI safety" brought up as a laughable attempt at stopping the progress of LLMs, when in reality the people talking about "AI safety" are the
225.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Isn't the phrase for "taking attention away from the cause of the issue to focus on the symptoms" "misinformation"? Curious how you see anything good coming from focusing the attention of the public away from the sy
226.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Agreed, anybody flying across the country to try and film societal issues for 'clout' needs some readjustment.
227.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Do you think drug addiction is a choice rather than a situation? How do you feel about the same thing being done to homeless encampments where you don't have the easy excuse of "those people deserve it"?
228.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Only if you think that "exposing" it(read: exploiting it for social media views) is doing anything to help the problem. Experts seem to think the shame and misrepresentation actually makes the situation worse rather than doing any
229.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
These tiktokers are drug addicts. It just so happens that drug is dopamine they produce by exploiting people on social media instead of injecting chemicals.
230.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
How is this a crucial question when they won't address "how is your technology thats trained from the internet going to survive in aa future where it produces most of the content on the internet"
231.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Isn't their point that docker brought incrementalness to this? So just like when you change one c file you don't have to recompile the whole project, updating the last layer in the image should only require a few mb of transfer, t
232.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
What does "prohibitively expensive" mean for a company that's largest cost is paid to its parent company at a rate completely decided by the parent company? Wouldn't anything that decreases the profit of twitch in South
233.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
How does this have anything to do with net neutrality? From what I can see, twitch is a business that benefits from the fact that most internet companies don't actually have to pay for internet connection services relative to their usa
234.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
If I have to pay more to access one service than another, that's against the idea of net neutrality(making services equitably easy to access). I don't understand how net neutrality applies in the opposite case though. If the hosti
235.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Why are they outrageous? I've yet to see a reason that Netflix/twitch/etc. having to pay for the infrastructure they profit massively from is a bad thing. If they have to pay a larger share, it means that services that don&#x
236.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
> It's a terrible economic model that punishes peering. Isn't that how most international trade agreements work? You either have to pay the taxes to manufacture in the country of origin, or you have to pay the import fees for i
237.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Market dominance is probably the reason. Canada had crown ISPs that offered unlimited data plans, so telcos has to do the same to compete and the idea of a fixed cap internet plan is rodiculous. When mobile data became popular there were no
238.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Isn't what you describe exactly how all ISPs work. Look how cheap service can be in countries where it's cheap, then look at the USA/Canada. Neither of them have sender party networks pays yet they both increase network conne
239.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Yea "they were too big to know something illegal was going on" is a narrative that benefits these large companies while ensuring any individuals or small companies that do the same see the full force of the law.
240.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
That's a strange framing. In that scenario would it not be that he made the decision he thought was right and aligned with openais mission initially, then when seeing the public support Sam had he decided to backtrack so he had a futur
More ›