Isn't what you describe exactly how all ISPs work. Look how cheap service can be in countries where it's cheap, then look at the USA/Canada. Neither of them ha

Isn't what you describe exactly how all ISPs work. Look how cheap service can be in countries where it's cheap, then look at the USA/Canada. Neither of them have sender party networks pays yet they both increase network connection costs way beyond what's necessary since they have regional monopolies. Basically why does a sender party network pays system lend itself to a monopoly, while rogers supporting entire businesses in Canada who have no alternative is not?