Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Xelynega
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
181.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
I'm confused on why they would need a TUN device for a client or server application, so why they would need this solution in the first place(even with their explanation). As I understand the only reason you'd use a TUN interface i
182.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
You can also sidestep that "quirky OS limitation" by just setting the first unprivileged port to 0(ip_unprivileged_port_start), no need for an new stack. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networkin
183.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
What I typically do is create a systemd service for game servers and attach a TTY. That way it starts with the rest of my web services, and linux already handles "i/o to processes" via files that other process can access(e.x.
184.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
That's still not how chatgpt works. That's how the plugin developed for iTerm2 works, but the actual result from chatgpt needs to be filtered by iTerm2 to get to the result in the demonstration. What's stopping the same filte
185.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Is this a real opinion people have, or am I misunderstanding... It sounds like you're recommending people to not understand the shell one-liners they're pasting into their CLI and instead just verify that the outcome was observe
186.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
The question isn't "is it useful", it's "should it be part of the core of the application". If this meets the bar for "worth inclusion in the core of the application", I would rather stick to terminal
187.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
That's also not how chatgpt works... And if it were, what's stopping the same filters to be added to google to convert the LLM output(or the google search results) into just the command to execute?
188.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Why can it not be a plugin for the terminal emulator? I understand why people don't like that "integrates with third party LLM services" was just added as a core feature to their terminal emulator(which are typically very min
189.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Why should they care about 'most software' if they have tools that work for them? For example I don't hate iTerm because I don't need to. I can just use a better terminal emulator and get on with my life. People say the
190.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
iTerm is pretty mid for a mac terminal emulator in my opinion. Before it I would recommend kitty or alacritty.
191.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Which has nothing to do with utf 8 encoding as the writer of the article said, and is an optional feature you have to configure.
192.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Unless I'm missing something these are nothing like SSH keys. They would be closer to regular password auth with SSH where you store the password in a file that's only readable by SSH. SSH keys are asymmetric such that I can make
193.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
It's up to the server whether it uses it in challenge-response or not. That's application-specific behaviour that's past the definition of passkeys themselves. The reason you couldn't have an open source passkey manager
194.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
They might care too, but think it's something they have no control over so don't try and change.
195.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I don't think the fact that communities like this still exist is a point against them. They state in the article that they are also involved in communities they would consider "old internet" using modern tools. I think their
196.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Erlang(and more modernly elixir/Gleam) are an example of this in practice, and were created to make it easier to ensure the working and manage the complexity of large systems.
197.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
If you own the car, why wouldn't you be able to attach something to both of the CAN busses from the interior?
198.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
> FZ is intended to clone keys and bypass security I'd say it's more of an educational/'hacker' toy than it is a useful security bypasser/key cloner. Purpose built(and better aot their job) those things cost
199.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I think an integrated hub would be a bit extra tbh. Amazon sells a coordinator usb for $20, so pair that with anything that can rub home assistant(raspi, ha green/yellow, old laptop, etc.) and you have a ZigBee hub that's plug and
200.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I haven't looked too much into thread/matter, but my understanding of them has been basically this: https://xkcd.com/927/ I shudder at the idea of ipv6 addresses for my lightbulbs.
201.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
They're looking for legal reasons to choose candidates they've decided beforehand.
202.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Exactly, if you have a human take in the information and make something that is arguably "different layout and pacing" then its possible it's not plagiarism. Unfortunately no such leeway exists for algorithms, and the human e
203.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
The problem is that open source philosophy and large language models don't mix. How can you support open source licensing, while completely ignoring that licencing to construct you model? That's the biggest reason for the lack of
204.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
To add to this, the people writing these articles are not stupid and know there is more than one understanding for the words they're using. They choose not to clarify on purpose, or they're incompetent and I don't want to bel
205.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
I have to believe this is the case. The vast majority of "ai safety" news I see is about some dumb shit someone is getting called out for supporting and the responses are always "ai safety is such a joke since they focus on t
206.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
No, if you copy the same layout of the information, pacing, etc. that's plagiarism. The line of plagiarism in modern society has already been drawn, and it's a lot further back than a lot of uncreative people that want to steal wo
207.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Could it be misdirection? If the "AI safety people" are criminalizing open source models while being silent about military uses of private models, doesn't that say more about the people calling them "ai safety experts&qu
208.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Notice how were 3 layers deep in a conversation about "AI safety" without anyone actually giving an opinion I support of safety. If I were a betting man I'd say the fact that the most public "AI safety" orgs/pe
209.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
Without a "large recipe model" to be able to vet these recipes that it's likely generating, I'd be worried about the accuracy and palatability of generated recipes. There are websites that have databases of recipes you c
210.
▲
by
Xelynega
3y ago
That's the neat thing about phones. You can program them to interact with you via touch and voice(and even camera in apps like Google lens) without having to purchase a new piece of hardware dedicate to accessibility.
More ›