Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Xelynega
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
What has been censored in them?
92.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
> When I read it my impression is that Feynmann is the kind of storyteller that doesn't let the boring real life details get in the way of a good story. Is this not an undesirable trait in non fiction stories?
93.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Elon Musk has a bachelor in science and business, I feel like a PhD scientists is allowed to complain about the media going to Elon Musk for science views rather than scientists
94.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
You should read some of the more egregious stories that have been published with his blessing. It's not just "experience in mischeveity", it's "being a general nuisance, then everyone clapped"
95.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Who is trying to "tear him down"? All I see is people trying to point out the differences between "Richard Feynman the character" and "Richard Feynman the real person" "Richard Feynman the character"
96.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
I don't think the problem people have is "Richard Feynman didn't produce content" It's "the content that people interacted with that they formed an opinion on "Richard Feynman" from was actually edito
97.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
A lot of the comments on this post are references to the book "surely you're joking Mr Feynman", which was a collection of stories(with a lot of embellishment) told by Feynman. That is the "sham legacy of Richard Feynman
98.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Pandering to whom?
99.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. "Surely you're joking Mr Feynman" was not written my Feynman and contained obviously fabricated stories. The fact that he was aware of this is more a point against his
100.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
It's interesting having this video be my introduction to Feynman, then seeing how people talk about his personality. She brings up points that don't seem easy to dispute, yet all of the comments here seem to be praise for the man
101.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
It's almost as if they're not trying to market to the people actually using the products, but trying to convince investors of features that don't exist
102.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
"I'm the elected president so I get to decide the allocation of government money" is basically the legal theory that Trump is putting forward to be challenged.
103.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Isaac Asimov wroted/edited ~500 books over his life. Some of the people mentioned in the research are coauthoring ~200 paper a year. I don't think Isaac would be in the same league as those mentioned in this paper.
104.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Looks like the number is off, but is their point any different with 212 papers? I still think that it would be impossible to give any meaningful support to 212 papers in a year. That's a new paper every 1.72 days.
105.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Not really since both give you wrong output that you need to design a system to account for(or deal with). The only percentage that would change the utility would be 100% accurate.
106.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
You do realize the guy you're talking about "dismantling and exposing" these immigration systems is the same one that wants to replace tech workers with H-1B visa? Maybe ask yourself why you/they are against immigration
107.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Maybe we should look a little bit closer at who was hellbent against Wikileaks, and whether or not they're the same people "live tweeting leaks". I have a feeling it's not the ethics of the actions that have changed, b
108.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Or how a malicious actor inside your network would follow exactly this plan to do malicious things without your knowledge...
109.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
And it's hard to argue that your method you "thought" would eliminate bias actually does eliminate the bias you set out to eliminate. The only way to do that is compare results with expectations, no?
110.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
How do companies with unions survive and thrive if all of your assumptions are correct and generally applicable?
111.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
I feel like there's some famous quote about facts and feelings not caring about one another...
112.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Maybe instead of punching down("everyone should have to live as bad as I do/did") you should be raising people up("everyone should live as good as they do/did")? Why not ask yourself what is stopping yourself f
113.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Don't you know, money is a perfect proxy for "goodness". If it makes money that means it must be "good", right?
114.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Do you honestly believe that hiring rate is determined by DEI departments and not budgets? Do you really, honestly believe that the FAA was using these practices to hire less people and not just hire the people they want to hire in the li
115.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Who is this "progressive" that for some reason is only allowed to speak in the most general of statements and not make claims backed up with evidence? A lot of people seem to be arguing against caricatures of arguments either they
116.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
In both those examples, why are you not giving the benefit of the doubt to the failed attempts? If GitHub attempted to anonymize applications and resulted in a biased selection, can that not be a result of them failing to eliminate the bias
117.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
Yes it is, but the court case only answered the first question and previous court cases failed to get a satisfactory(for the conservative groups behind them) ruling on the "illegal discrimination" parts. It's also possible th
118.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
> Did you just make that up and hope no one would call you out? No, but it looks like a lot of people are misunderstanding the court's ruling... `The question presented is whether the admissions systems used by Harvard College and U
119.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
How many of these women are graduating from programs that people wanting to eliminate DEI see as "unimportant"? It's also interesting to see statistics brought up about women and not races, since the percentage that identifie
120.
▲
by
Xelynega
2y ago
You point to the issue Republicans have with trans people existing, isn't that a counterpoint to your point? They were able to make a massive issue out of the existence of less than a percent of the population, if the can do that how c
More ›