Xelbair

9 ms·

91.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Removing barriers to civil engineering building design is a feature. Who needs to calculate load bearing supports, walls, and floors when you can just vibe oversize it by 50%.
92.
by Xelbair 1y ago
There's a big difference between hammering something down over and over again until protesters and opposition gives up and "situation has changed, lets revisit this".
93.
by Xelbair 1y ago
That small little caveat already makes it a non-option
94.
by Xelbair 1y ago
or simply betting on the fact that GDPR is selectively enforced(and i think that's the biggest problem with it)
95.
by Xelbair 1y ago
how do you determine causation from correlation in experiment where you are unable to separate all the factors? you can't. not agreeing with one side or other - because i frankly don't know enough about it to form an opinion, but
96.
by Xelbair 1y ago
>Some websites, mostly news outlets, can legally withhold access completely, and do, unless you accept all cookies or pay for membership. GDPR article 7, section 4: When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost account shall be
97.
by Xelbair 1y ago
The same reasoning could be used against civil rights movement. That's why we don't do that, if our systems are functioning fine.
98.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Personally i would prefer trade union, as EU countries have shown themselves already incapable of offering support in case of any real threat due to conflicting interests, and federation would most likely end up being run by Germany/Fr
99.
by Xelbair 1y ago
find me single unregulated unrestricted free market that has been operating for centuries. the ancap paradise.
100.
by Xelbair 1y ago
I'm not saying they have top-down control. I'm saying they are trying top-down initiatives - the difference is subtle but important. This is about attitude and how attempts are made - not how successful they are at it. This isn&#x
101.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Pharma is miles behind US, Financial central was mostly London due to favorable local laws. Nokia fills very small niche now, basically services backbone Bosch and Siemens predate EU BWM also, but i wouldn't put it at forefront of inno
102.
by Xelbair 1y ago
>the EU would be a great place to build software companies if the governments weren't hostile to the idea of large tech companies which is where the market wants to go. All unregulated markets over time tend to strive for monopoly,
103.
by Xelbair 1y ago
>EU isn't ever going to have its own "tech" industry as long as US has full access to EU markets and IMHO the ChatControl thing is totally unrelated. It's even simpler - EU does not foster any form of framework for gr
104.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Any that you can put in store mode, and run all smart features off separate device. Otherwise it will run out of updates fast, services will stop working and only way to fix that is to buy.. a separate device. This also let's you make
105.
by Xelbair 1y ago
why would i bother when you've already established that you're arguing in bad faith?
106.
by Xelbair 1y ago
so you've made up your mind beforehand, and will never change your views on any of this. why you even do you bother to keep arguing in bad faith?
107.
by Xelbair 1y ago
majority in 2, due to worsening economic situation over the years and total disappointment in current options with no other option to break this impasse than to throw hand grenade into the mix. exactly one person in first group - a genuine
108.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Same, they push tariffs it seems mostly to protect automotive industry from competition, the industry which has grown bloated and rent-seeking over the years. Even more so when you take build quality and support quality in the equation.
109.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Even if you get EU grant, you can't run a startup that way. You have to basically have full plan set in stone, and you will be checked if it was fulfilled to avoid waste of EU money. The problem is that you cannot pivot easily, you can
110.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Honestly the bigger problem - even with the current topic - is that everything is top down. They don't make a framework for XYZ to emerge based on market forces. It's always committee driven 'we will support this initiative s
111.
by Xelbair 1y ago
You've made a lot of assumptions about people i know and talk with - without knowing them, exactly showcasing the problem that I've mentioned. As soon as the topic is mentioned it becomes a discussion stopper. Thank you for your c
112.
by Xelbair 1y ago
There's distinction between legality, reality and morality. Most of the time no one uses full formal legal terms in normal conversation. I don't support AfD, I'm not German either - i just agree with parent poster's obse
113.
by Xelbair 1y ago
right now there's an industry standard way to measure perceived loudness, and at least in saner places - the limits were already set in place.
114.
by Xelbair 1y ago
arbitrary requirements as in they could be disabled quite easily in early w11 builds by flipping a flag. There's nothing depending on it that prevents OS to run.
115.
by Xelbair 1y ago
>Devils advocate. Everyone really should be on Secure Boot / Bitlocker / TPM2.0 in the Windows space. nope. only useful for corporate setting. We should be able to run anything we want, however we want, without any arbitrary re
116.
by Xelbair 1y ago
have you read the reply thread?
117.
by Xelbair 1y ago
and how many more fall upwards?
118.
by Xelbair 1y ago
engineer? sure. execs and upper management who instigate such incidents? almost no real punishment ever happens.
119.
by Xelbair 1y ago
I'll go even further and bring up Trusting Trust - whole chain needs to be open source and verifiable. and you need to be able to compile each and every part of it.
120.
by Xelbair 1y ago
Punishment should match the crime, to both rehabilitate and be preventative. White collar crime gets basically no punishment, and looking at career of those people they usually end up falling upwards. For such cases banning them from being

More ›