Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Xeamek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
121.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Have no idea why people dow vote you, you are obvously correct abiut javascript being popular because its popular, not because it is a good tool in isolation. Besides,Isn't typescript developed by the same people who made C# and also t
122.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
But syntactic sugar is important though. Arguably one of the biggest downsides of c++ is that it has tons of features without there being a syntactic sugar for using them, which in turn makes them less attractive
123.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
You realize there are anti-trusts laws in the US as well, right?
124.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Games I understand, but what makes automotive a place that uses a lot of binary files?
125.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
> It’s a nightmare to handle and use. Why? If all Your work and knowledge is confined in one repo, there still is a way to work only on that part. Or at least there should be. But if You want/need to have access to other parts, it&#
126.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
To be fair, samsung pay is only avaible in like 10(?) countries. But yeah, point still stands
127.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
>Disable Secure Boot and Fast Boot in the BIOS. If Fast Boot is enabled, accessing the BIOS by pressing F2 is difficult. Instead, I have to use Settings > System > Recovery > Advanced startup in Windows, and after rebooting, cho
128.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Have you tried 'wezTerm'?
129.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Meh, software should be designed around being efficient from the start. Doing it as a 'post-process' will most likely result in just another layer of semi-grifting "specialists" that will come up with over complicated &q
130.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Being obtuse is when you don't accept currently popular bounds of abstractions are God given axioms.
131.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
How is that different?
132.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Nobody in the linked article suggested doing that
133.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Pedantry. Yes you are running your code on the cpu, but you are using opengl defined api to do so. Having a text generation and parsing, or having a function calls passed to/from drivers- those a simply implementation details
134.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
As in: based on physical one, where the perceived abstractions aren't completely arbitrary solely on the discretion of programmer, but come from some observable fact.
135.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Science and ethics are connected literally for ever
136.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
It always surprising to me when people on programming related forum, a discipline that in a sense is all about viewing the world trough different levels of abstractions, get defensive when exposed to the fact that real world also do have t
137.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
But that's not inherent due to gpus completely revolutionizing their aproach every generation, is it? The main difference is that with cpu, the translation unit is hidden inside the cpu itself. With gpus, the translation is moved from
138.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
...But literally the exact same is the case for CPUs and yet we do have public and constant instruction set for decades now? Altough ofcourse CPU's instruction are also just a frontend api that behind the scenes is implemented using mi
139.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
The automatization of moderation is legitimately one of the scariest problems with modern internet, but because it's abuse and mistakes inherently affect tiny minority, nobody cares. And obviously companies will fallback to automated t
140.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
>Do You think people just don't care about security Yes, people don't care nearly as much as we like to pretend in online debates
141.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
I agree. My point is that I just feel like "but someone please think of the ̶ ̶c̶h̶i̶l̶d̶r̶e̶n̶ memory safety" argument is over blown. There are ways to eliminate majority of those issues in cpp as well, but people simply don
142.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
>more modern and less dangerous language than most people think Compared to what? Itself from 20 years ago? That's great, but not nearly enough. Cpp just has SO MUCH FRICTION that it's simply not worth it to deal with it. Maybe
143.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
And how many of such bugs could be prevented with compiler warnings and flags?
144.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Imo it can go both ways; What You are saying isn't wrong, but on the other hand, AI tools will make the job of generalists easier, as they can learn/use new tools faster and can have reasonable performance without the need of hav
145.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
This is too reductive. The 'we analyzed the issue and decided it won't be fix' Is NOT the same as 'we don't cate about this, go talk to some other team and maybe they'll fix it'. Deciding something is no
146.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
I don't necessarily disagree, in fact I think Your point is quite salient. I do however think it is somewhat a pity that this sort of 'innovation strategist' is thought of as a domain for executives and directors, because tho
147.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Really glad to read this, while it's not strictly 'revolutionary' thought, having it formulated and expressed on paper does boost my own confidence in the way I aproach self-growth, as someone who aspires to be this type of
148.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
>It feels like no real kids are testing the parental controls I feel the same can be said about accessibility service: Once you get the accessibility permission, you have FULL control over the user's device. They could just split t
149.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
They said 'go ask them' a out why they decided to close the issue (which also implies that someone went over this already), not 'go ask them because we simply don't care to look', as your comment seem to imply...
150.
▲
by
Xeamek
3y ago
Eh, calling an embedded web-view a 'screet google browser' smells a bit clickbait'ish. In situations where it bypasses things like parental control its fair to bring it up as an issue, but it's not exactly a 'vulner
More ›