Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
X86BSD
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
271.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Maybe I missed it in the comments but was I the only one to run Wildcat! software for their board? I loved Wildcat!
272.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
So depending on your use case, some of you might be very interested in CloudABI. See: https://nuxi.nl to solve some of your issues. Ed is a FreeBSD committer and has been working on solving some of the harder problems relating t
273.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Liability laws are in dire need in the software industry. Security for instance would not be such an abysmal disaster if companies were held liable for the insecure garbage they are pumping out.
274.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Yeah that has always been my understanding as well. Past employers are only allowed to say yes or no to you working there if asked. Where this comes from I don't know. I'm sure there is a law that this common belief comes from.
275.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Have you tested running it on a FreeBSD box with ZFS? It has lz4 compression by default and makes such a great storage solution for PG. You get compression, snapshots, replication (not quite realtime but close), self healing, etc etc in a b
276.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Capabilities? FreeBSD, and other Unix flavors have had caps for decades. No one uses them. Security is useless if no one uses it. Capabilities are too hard, too complex, to manage. Great idea. Horrible implementation.
277.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Sugar. Hands down. Dr. Atkins is right.
278.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Conquered lands are not exactly partnerships.
279.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
I have come to loathe Google. Android is a tire fire mess. It's UI is horrible. And as bad as that is I have google fiber tv and that UI is even worse. Google does NOT get UI. Everything short of gmail that they have tried to make work
280.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Then it's missing in that site. BSDtar was the replacement.
281.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Before the rewrite all the GNU utilities were in the base OS. How large a percentage that was to the rest of the base I couldn't say off the top of my head. But all the GNU utilities were in there as well as the compiler suite which ha
282.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
I would, GNU tar and others were rewritten from scratch over the last decade or so. The GNU utilities are no longer in the base system.
283.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Actually they are not. POSIX? Sure. But Linux is notorious for NIH and is incredibly off in the weeds in incompatible and broken ways from the UNIX world. Have you tried porting software written for Linux to another platform??
284.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
FreeBSD took great pains to rewrite and replace all of the GNU utilities with BSD licensed ones. So the tools are different.
285.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Curious, I didn't see mention of this, but perhaps someone here knows, is there TRIM support or planned support for bcachefs?
286.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
As is the Nintendo Switch.
287.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Most of those are just FreeBSD. Pulling from the FreeBSD tree for their base.
288.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Haha yes! Where the hell do these people learn that?? The other thing that annoys me with ratings in general, specifically places like amazon, is when people pan a perfectly good item because of some third party factor. "Item was great
289.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Tarsnap. It's the best offsite, secure, cloud storage out there.
290.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Well I am very impressed. I had no idea fiber was literally everywhere down there. Kudos to you man for making it work! My wife is from the NCR region of Delhi, I hope you take over bangalore and then Delhi and make a fortune! :)
291.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
I'm trying to find out. Oddly enough searching the FreeNAS docs on the website for "docker" returns nothing. I've seen reference to jails mostly regarding running docker and to a lesser extent bhyve. Anyone running runni
292.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Reminds me of the joke, "How do you get docker to be secure? Run it inside a (FreeBSD) jail." Having not looked at it that's my guess what they are doing. Everything related to it is in a jail. Making it secure regardless of
293.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Where are you getting fast Ethernet pipes to stores there?? Having been there I find it hard to believe that infrastructure is there.
294.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Well done iXsystems and FreeNAS developers! You blow the doors literally off everything else.
295.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Yeah I believe Matt forked FreeBSD 4.x to start dragonfly.
296.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Can you clarify "TCP can't move a gigabit per second across the public internet." I have google fiber btw and I have gotten a gb/sec from it.
297.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
This is a common fallacy GPL enthusiasts often spew. You can't make BSDL code disappear all you can do is fork it and add or modify to your copy of it. The original is still there.
298.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
It's not the point. At least with the BSDL. People who use the BSDL just want people to USE their code. They don't care how. They have no animosity towards private, commercial use of it. NetAPP has supported bsd camps in many ways
299.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
LLVM to replace GCC being another prime example.
300.
▲
by
X86BSD
10y ago
Can't be for certain but one possible large factor is it reduces diffs from the upstream if you commit as much as you can back upstream. It's a major engineering drag to deal with that.
More ›