Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Wowfunhappy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
23d ago
> At this point what news site isn't AI written? The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, The Atlantic, NPR, BBC, The Verge, The Economist. That's just off the top of my head. Basically none of the reputable p
32.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
24d ago
My point is that you need to put out that documentation before the start of the rollout, or people won't find it when they look for it. I guess you could quietly update documentation at the start of the rollout, then make the blog post
33.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
24d ago
> I can consistently reproduce this by asking Claude which code snippet it prefers: the one it generated in a different chat, or one that I refactored for my own needs and find more useful. Interesting. For me I've noticed it tends
34.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
24d ago
Sorry, yes, that's what I meant by being "clever with Claude Code command line flags", I guess it's not really that clever. But in general if you just launch Claude Code normally and use it via the interactive CLI, you c
35.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
24d ago
I find it interesting that you put the instruction ("animate this") in the system prompt, while the prompt just had the existing SVG and no actual instructions on what to do with it. Anthropic's consumer-facing tools generall
36.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
25d ago
But consider what the alternative looks like: People randomly see unexpected options in their apps, go to look for information about them, and don't find anything, or find some random Reddit discussion where no one is sure what's
37.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
26d ago
> its actually only ~3PB (compress to 1PB, ~$22,000/mo in S3) and a few thousand/mo in compute over less than 4 months to index the entire internet for pretraining purposes. That is super interesting, thank you! > At that pr
38.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
26d ago
Who exactly is running all these scrapers? There are, what, maybe 15 major AI labs, if that? And none of them are smart enough to realize they could just `git clone` all the content and use it offline?
39.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
26d ago
But if the original data is the whole internet (and then some), what would that even look like? Would it be useful to anyone? Are individuals going to re-run the training?
40.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
26d ago
What if you use the open weight models?
41.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
27d ago
> Attribution is professional. It's also, like, kind of the point of using git, isn't it? So putting this in the commit message feels very appropriate to me.
42.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
28d ago
I too dislike logging into Twitter/X, but that's not a paywall , the accounts are still free, no?
43.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
> API Error: Opus 4.8’s safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to re
44.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
I know that's true for Qwen but I don't think most models work that way?
45.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
...the evidence, as best I can tell from the tweet, is that they asked Claude what effort level it was set to. But how would the model even know that? Not convinced here.
46.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
I often get cold emails from people interested in my very specific hobby (see website in profile). These are desired and fun. Mind, they are not written by LLMs. I would consider that spam, outside of very limited circumstances (maybe a non
47.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
...I agree but I also kind of like it? More software should aim to be both useful and fun.
48.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
I have tried both and I find the Claude models give me much better results. I wish they didn't since Codex is cheaper. For me it's not just branding.
49.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
> LLMs are also terrible at these new standards. If they even know about them, they often think they're not baseline yet and they have almost zero training data compared to the giant mountain of weird JS and CSS that people had to u
50.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
It sounds to me like you're describing enshittification. As coined by Cory Doctorow: > Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; f
51.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
You can inject custom Javascript into Claude Code via BUN_OPTIONS="--preload=/path/to/code.js". For example: https://gist.github.com/Wowfunhappy/002009cf9c410ed2f751bde8... I wonder if you coul
52.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
>> The thing that will work is actually curing cancer. > This is honestly hilarious. Dario must think people are stupid. I mean, if Claude actually cures cancer, I do think he'll be right. The only problem is that you need to
53.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
...I'm not saying this is good, but doesn't the existence of inflation mean we'll always keep breaking this record?
54.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
...so like, I'm not actually sure the copy and destroy thing is wrong. Hear me out. As an artist, the value of your work is directly related to how many copies are in circulation. You have been paid for the existing copies--you would l
55.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
> https://github.com/robss2020/claude-fable-5-having-fun If you haven't already seen it, you might appreciate https://www.anthropic.com/research/global-workspace . That's what this mad
56.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
...I mean, on the whole, I'm glad it's detectable. I imagine they could have post-trained it to not be detectable.
57.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
> You just can't compress the entire human knowledge into a 30GB file. ...I'm just asking questions here... how sure are we of this? If you'd asked me six years ago whether we could compress all of human knowledge into a 1
58.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
> It used to be that you bought a piece of software and used that version until you decided it was worth upgrading, like a particular physical tool. But Claude is running on someone else's computer, not yours, so it's not Photo
59.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
Sorry, I meant the Codex CLI harness. I don't understand why OpenAI decided to start using the "Codex" name for everything.
60.
▲
by
Wowfunhappy
1mo ago
Because: 1. The first significant agentic harness was made by Anthropic. 2. One of the most senior developers of client-side software at Anthropic is Felix Rieseberg, one of the original creators of Electron. [1] 3. After Claude Code blew u
More ›