Vogtinator

10 ms·

61.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Most PCs of that era had it as well. It still exists today at least for waking up from suspend. It's even exposed through WakeSystem=true in systemd timers.
62.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Agreed. I don't see a way this can be done without one side trusting the other implicitly. If the sniffer/MitM gets either the measured data (to replay) or the unsealed key (to use directly) it's game over. > I don’t see h
63.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
> Their internal CPU design team is years ahead of the ARM team. Was. They're now at Qualcomm.
64.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Yeah, but it's enforced to run stock firmware in other ways. SafetyNet for once. Having mechanisms like this in place unfortunately makes it easier for others to abuse them for DRM.
65.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
I'd bet $10.50 that they don't care. Look what happened to Kuka.
66.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Somehow my experience is the other way around: Arch updates more slowly but somehow still manages to be much less stable...
67.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
There are similar instructions on PowerPC (rlwinm) and bfi/ubfx instructions on ARMv8.
68.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
"ran"? AFAIK he still does, he just moved from New York to Austin, Texas.
69.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
I wonder why they set the LSB to indicate an integer and clear it for other types. If they did it the other way, integer operations could be faster as the +1/-1 would not be necessary any longer.
70.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Not necessary undesirable, but definitely surprising as it's a major change from the current behaviour.
71.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
> The Apple II took advantage of the speed difference between CPU and DRAM and designed the video hardware to read from memory every other memory cycle, interleaved with CPU memory access. Same for the C64. Sometimes it was necessary to
72.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Yeah, because it affects networking in the entire system. If some pam session module were to set up its own network namespace that is shared by all user processes after login, this could be (mostly) solved. The result would be some surprisi
73.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Looks like another case of a vulnerability which was handled poorly by upstream: Bad/insufficient communication and multiple embargo violations. Ultimately this means there is no fix available yet and no ETA when there will be one.
74.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
This is only because MacBooks do not support MST. On all of my non MacBook laptops I can use multiple monitors over USB-C.
75.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
It's not just binary compatible - it uses the SLES binaries directly
76.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Only a few though. Support for the CPU, chipset components and GPU are contributed by the component vendors themselves. Other components use standard interfaces, like AHCI, XHCI, NVMe, HD audio, ... Not much remains up to the brands like Ac
77.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
If the new language would allow such a tool to work, it probably wouldn't be much better. It would either still have most of the awful behavior that the old language had or the converted scripts wouldn't be better than before. The
78.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
> Sorry, you don’t get a license to be an asshole until you literally invent Linux. That doesn't grant you a license either.
79.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
I'm referring to the "You can redistribute the source, but then we'll cancel support" part which appears to be part of the terms and conditions.
80.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
How does this not violate the GPL?
81.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Looks somewhat similar to https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-enforcing-bounds-safety-in-... .
82.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
I suppose the people from the district of Darmstadt-Wixhausen might. That's literally "Colon city - jerk town".
83.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
"Secure Boot" here is unrelated to the MS controlled one on PCs.
84.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Any Sony Xperia: https://developer.sony.com/develop/open-devices
85.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
If Sony counts as mainstream vendor, the bootloader is unlockable and they even provide instructions on how to build and flash your own Android! https://developer.sony.com/develop/open-devices
86.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
There's another reason but it's even worse: Some certifications require that secure boot is enabled.
87.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
"spontaneously" is "plötzlich".
88.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
You forgot the </sarcasm> tag. Or are you actually serious with your comment? GCC supports various "flavors" of C, including fully standard compliant versions. GNU extensions are all documented.
89.
by Vogtinator 3y ago
Not fully comparable because passwords usually give you more than just read access.
90.
by Vogtinator 4y ago
> it literally never lags no matter what or is ever unresponsive regardless of what i'm doing That's more the OS scheduling and userspace software than actual hardware. I don't experience any lag even on my father's 1

More ›