ViewTrick1002

7 ms·

61.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
How come you get macro expansion errors? Or is it because you write incorrect syntax in the enum error definitions? The example on the docs page is quite clear: https://docs.rs/thiserror/latest/thiserror/#exam
62.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Right. The famous stdlib where once good libraries go to die so you instead depend on the latest community replacement choice. Also argparse for Clap: https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html
63.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
> rusqlite (sqlite), clap (cli), ratatui (tui), and tauri (gui) Does any language, except like Java, exist with a standard library comprising matching that? Also, keep in mind that Tauri itself is 14 crates, where each one shows up in yo
64.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
They all convert seamlessly, and the enums make the branches explicit. Don't even need to check the documentation to find which errors supposedly exists like in Go with its errors.Is, errors.As, wrapping and what not. An easy rule befo
65.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
> The huge advantage they have over people in general is that ideally if they figure this out then it will stay figured out. Then they can slowly role out and watch for the next hitches from new situations. That is not a given when deali
66.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
It is a direct correlation with the electricity price. As the evening peak is saturated the morning peak will follow. Followed by the night.
67.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
They are using unsafe since large portions of Bun is interfacing with other unsafe codebases. Together with a "1:1" rewrite from Zig to Rust. And it's not like Bun when written in Zig has been a beacon of stability either. It
68.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Agree. There's stuff missing, and there are problems which likely are "multiple Phd theses" level to solve cohesively. Either in Rust or a successor language when the problem space has been explored. For me the most annoying
69.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Rust had that, but decided it wasn’t a good enough fit. Which was the motivation to keep exploring and land on the current async implementation which scales from embedded to servers with minimal overhead. History: This RFC proposes to remo
70.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
If you need predictable price buy futures. If they increase in price then firm production is stimulated to build to meet the gap. https://www.next-kraftwerke.com/knowledge/futures-market
71.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Electricity is expensive in Central Europe because the ETS system (carbon trading) has made fossil based production expensive. We’re right in the middle of the transition with maximum volatility swinging between extremely cheap renewables a
72.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Personally I have moved to k3s, although after learning a bit too deep how k8s operates when writing custom controllers at the day job. Docker/containers are great, especially for local development. But I feel the docker compose model
73.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
You do realize that you went completely off the rails here? I still haven't seen you levy a single factual criticism to the methodology in the paper I linked. It is just you lashing out. Again you don't care about cumulative emiss
74.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Still. What the industry learnt after Fukushima was to tighten the and stress test the plans. An even stronger mandate to "within this area always evacuate". Looking at what is happening gas usage is cratering all over Europe. Wha
75.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Which means you are advocating for slower decarbonziation. > If you don't build nuclear now, you'll have higher emissions when you use gas firming. This means neither technology nor markets will ever change. I think here you ha
76.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
And what is the method for say Poland to bring down their 589 gCO2 per kWh emission intensity with the lowest cumulative emissions? Waiting until the 2040s for new built nuclear power or you know, just investing in renewables and storage? Y
77.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
In which the peer review presents numbers that’s a fraction of all modern western nuclear power while not giving renewables the same benefit. > Check out how TWh/y of clean power evolved in Denmark vs UAE with Barakah built by Korea
78.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Which is again hindsight trying to downplay what was at hand. How do you know it wouldn’t become worse than Chernobyl when you have lost control? This is all hindsight speaking trying to downplay what risks nuclear power poses, because acce
79.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
I do notice that you are talking about past papers rather than this current one. You also link another of the typical studies desperately trying to shove new built nuclear power into contention. It looks like this: ”If we assume nuclear pow
80.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
You’re still missing the point. Radiation data was known. But that assumes that it can’t change. How can you assume that nothing will change for nuclear plant undergoing hydrogen explosions which you’ve lost all control over? I think you kn
81.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Here your blind conviction always praise nuclear power lost you the plot. All based on hindsight. Knowing the outcome that happened and perfectly slicing the decisions to fit that. How do you expect to be the politician ordering not to evac
82.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Why are you so afraid of renewables and storage? All recent research coming are showing that BEV batteries last longer than expected in real world conditions. You do realize that with 60 TWh we’re arguing about which decimal of 99.x% renewa
83.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
We of course can’t scale the grid portion of battery production as fast, or even faster than what we’ve done for BEVs? And this also disregards that second life automotive batteries are incredibly hot on the market. All those TWh of batteri
84.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
They do count, but look at it from a societal perspective. For the general public no harm can come their way. Unless they through some mechanical failure manage to walk underneath a wind turbine shedding or collapsing. Same with solar. Whic
85.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
They didn’t. The French nuclear buildout famously experienced negative learning by doing. Within a generation costs lowered, but between generations they exploded. And the reductions were to small to make a dent in how horrifyingly expensiv
86.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Hinkley Point C and EDF just got a 7% interest rate to finish the project. That is after nearly 20 years of project work and 10 years of construction, so about all risk should already have been found. Like I said. The costs are 40% lower th
87.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Or just batteries? Throw on a gas turbine emergency reserve running your favorite fossil or green fuel for well, the emergencies. We’re talking irrelevant emissions. I truly can’t comprehend where this massive boner for new built nuclear po
88.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Given a 10-15 year lifetime of the batteries, with BEVs being flexible storage consumers that seems well within reach in a couple of years? We’re seeing the reshaping of the entire global energy system. Either we jump on the train or get ru
89.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Or an iron air. Or flow battery. Or sodium. Or all manner of different lithium chemistries across NCA, NMC, LFP and so on. We’re seeing the Cambrian explosion of battery technology. From early BEVs utilizing the highest performance to even
90.
by ViewTrick1002 5mo ago
Even with Danish insolation and weather and tilting the study heavily towards nuclear power by assuming that the nuclear costs are 40% lower than Flamanville 3 and 70% lower than Hinkley Point C while modeling solar as 20% more expensive re

More ›