Veserv

59 ms·

781.
by Veserv 3y ago
At a product level, yes. The Common Criteria SKPP certification process explicitly required the operating system under evaluation to be impervious to the NSA penetration testers evaluating the system with full access to the source code and
782.
by Veserv 3y ago
You are not aligned at all with my comment. I said CISOs are uniformly incompetent at cybersecurity. No matter how many resources they are provided they are uniformly incapable of delivering security acceptable to the business customers, sh
783.
by Veserv 3y ago
1. No. To quote the very same Guice documents you are pointing at: "What is dependency injection? Dependency injection is a design pattern wherein classes declare their dependencies as arguments instead of creating those dependencies d
784.
by Veserv 3y ago
Untrue (in general). The CSO is frequently given lots of budget and authority. Having talked to some of the big bank executive teams, they have thousands of employees and hundreds of M$ budgets with wide latitude to enforce restrictions. It
785.
by Veserv 3y ago
Dependency injection has always been such a bad name for the concept. It is just passing dependencys as arguments. Though the funniest part about it is that the things we use every day, programming languages and build systems, still do not
786.
by Veserv 3y ago
What? Pegasus is not enabled by modem vulnerabilities. The primary vulnerabilities used on iOS phones are in Apple designed and implemented components and the primary vulnerabilities used on Android phones are in Google designed and impleme
787.
by Veserv 3y ago
Well, for one, humans have two eyes in front with the same focal length giving us binocular vision. The people at Tesla apparently think humans only have one eye which is why they keep spewing the nonsensical analogy to human perception. Th
788.
by Veserv 3y ago
Your argument is: “Ha, Tesla actively suppressed and concealed 95% of the evidence so you do not have enough evidence to prove them wrong. Checkmate. Tesla just hides it because it is too vindicating. So you have no choice but to believe th
789.
by Veserv 3y ago
You claimed Tesla systems are safe stating: “Your contention is that having FSD the car makes accidents more likely because people will rely on it when they shouldn't be driving at all. The statistics don't seem to bear that out.
790.
by Veserv 3y ago
Given that I said reports to NHTSA it should be obvious that I am talking about the NHTSA SGO database [1]. But thanks for boldly calling me a conspiracy theorist when I quote data from official Tesla reports to the government. As to your o
791.
by Veserv 3y ago
So your complaint is what, terminology? Tesla deliberately deceives the public by intentionally publishing bogus, misleading analysis about their fire rates that deliberately imply Teslas are reduced fire hazards when Teslas actually result
792.
by Veserv 3y ago
I have no idea what you are even talking about. The page has clear links to news stories corroborating the deaths. Here are a few in 2022 with minimal paywalls: [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20221111234459/https:
793.
by Veserv 3y ago
Okay, now do the statistics for the number of people who burned to death. Actually, no need, I have them right here. The NFPA (the same organization Tesla is quoting for vehicle fire counts) estimates 560 fire deaths per year in the US over
794.
by Veserv 3y ago
I do not understand what you are even trying to imply. Why even bring up that <1% of crashes have fatalities? Are you trying to claim that these Tesla systems were only responsible for ~9 fatalities? You are aware that the very same data
795.
by Veserv 3y ago
No, that is what any competent researcher would do. Here is an example from Waymo: https://storage.googleapis.com/waymo-uploads/files/documents... But if you are like Tesla and can not even be bothered to put in a
796.
by Veserv 3y ago
There are no third party statistics since Tesla lawyers actively force NHTSA to redact information from any reports they do make. Even ignoring the fact that Tesla habitually lies and acts in bad faith to consumers and investors alike, the
797.
by Veserv 3y ago
Oh no, you are presenting a simple problem that would take you, cryptonym, all of 30 seconds to figure out a solution to since you are obviously smart enough to think things through. In fact, you could even cheat by looking at the other res
798.
by Veserv 3y ago
Does tracy support automatic function entry/exit (FEE) traces (i.e. all functions are automatically instrumented with a start/end)? The documentation seems to indicate traces are all manual which is pretty inconvenient. There are
799.
by Veserv 3y ago
You are arguing a meaningless point. The argument form takes what you hope humanity will become as a parameter. You extrapolate from there to determine under what circumstances humanity can become that desired future given the facts we ha
800.
by Veserv 3y ago
That is easy. If they claim the contract-encumbered work is worth 0 dollars for tax reasons, then anybody (who does not intend to commit breach of contract) should be allowed to buy the fully encumbered work for 0 dollars and the original o
801.
by Veserv 3y ago
Of course it makes no sense if you are answering the wrong question. The question being asked is not: "Why do we not see grabby aliens?" The question being asked is: "Under what circumstances can humanity become grabby aliens
802.
by Veserv 3y ago
You have missed the point. The goal is humanity becoming Star Trek and enclosing every star in a Dyson Sphere; the goal is determining whether 4 is true or false. The question is what is stopping it. The entire point of these thought exerci
803.
by Veserv 3y ago
The hypothesis goes: I want humans to be casually interstellar and expand across the galaxy. I want this to occur in less than N years, N << 10^10. If humans are casually interstellar and expansionist, then we would colonize the galax
804.
by Veserv 3y ago
Transparently remapping good storage over bad storage to deal with faulty sectors is standard practice in hard disk drives and solid state drives. It was historically done in software, though these days it is largely done in the drive micro
805.
by Veserv 3y ago
Congestion control is largely orthogonal to transport protocol design. You can basically slap the general shape of any congestion control algorithm onto whatever transport protocol you want. Their interaction is largely at the level of: “Ho
806.
by Veserv 3y ago
“with contended resources” is the part you are misinterpreting. They are saying that two applications that contend on a resource must cooperate to operate properly. As they clearly state later: “Making everything cooperative increases the a
807.
by Veserv 3y ago
“Defect” implies a necessary response. A defective product is a product that a manufacturer is legally obligated to repair, replace, or refund. A “defect notice” is thus a notice that the manufacturer is legally obligated to remediate the p
808.
by Veserv 3y ago
You two are talking past each other. They are saying that a real time application requires a transitive closure analysis of all cooperating partners to verify if service can be guaranteed. A cooperative scheduler requires you to extend the
809.
by Veserv 3y ago
I am aware it is a term of art and that the nature of the fix is independent of the presence of a dangerous defect requiring prompt remediation i.e. a recall. Unfortunately, lay understanding of the term results in objectively wrong stateme
810.
by Veserv 3y ago
The meaning of the word “recall” has been eroded. At this point we would be better served by renaming it to a more descriptive term. Dangerous defect notice. “Initiated safety recalls require a manufacturer's action to announce and rem

More ›