Veserv

28 ms·

391.
by Veserv 1y ago
If he sought victory, then he believed it was a just case and would not settle. If he settled, then he believed it was a unjust case and would not fight. If such a person settles and fights then they are acting in two contradictory ways w
392.
by Veserv 1y ago
Er, you should reread the quote: "We will never surrender/settle an unjust case against us". He just settled. That means it must have been a just case. That or he is a hypocritical self-aggrandizing liar when he claims the Fr
393.
by Veserv 1y ago
You do not need to assume, here is Elon Musk talking about his lawsuit philosophy: "My commitment: - We will never seek victory in a just case against us, even if we will probably win. - We will never surrender/settle an unjust ca
394.
by Veserv 1y ago
You appear to be approaching my proposal as if it were a complete RFC intended to describe a complete end-to-end MTU discovery protocol. I am describing a primitive that can be used to efficiently implement MTU discovery. I did not describe
395.
Tesla settles with worker who claimed employees told "welcome to the plantation"(the-independent.com)
52 points by Veserv 1y ago|32 comments
396.
by Veserv 1y ago
Coming after Diaz v Tesla [1] where Tesla was found guilty of racial harassment and discrimination in that same Fremont, California plant (as can be seen here on page 3-11 [2]) to a degree that the jury deemed it worthy of a $136.9 million
397.
by Veserv 1y ago
Can you please explain how a malicious node on your path truncating packets to 0x500 bytes is distinct from a 0x500 byte path MTU? The distinction between this and a false ICMP packet is that a valid ICMP packet from a node in your path com
398.
by Veserv 1y ago
I just do not understand the problems you are stating. Let me present a concrete example. We have A <-> B <-> C. A wishes to transmit a packet of 0x1000 bytes containing a Ethernet, IPv4, and then bespoke protocol, P, which is a
399.
by Veserv 1y ago
Your first point appears to be about physical layer concerns. My suggestion was not meant to operate at that level. The proposed model assumes the physical layer guarantees point-point delivery of a distinct packet between adjacent nodes in
400.
by Veserv 1y ago
You truncate for all packet types. Data in transit is almost never split for reasons other than fragmentation to avoid MTU problems. Any such split necessarily defines a fragmentation and reconstruction protocol so it still "preserves&
401.
by Veserv 1y ago
I literally have no idea what you are talking about. You can send garbage packets that conform to no known protocol on the internet. You can get more bit errors or perfect bit errors that make your bit error detection pass while still forwa
402.
by Veserv 1y ago
Packets do not get “cut-off” normally. That is kind of the point. Some protocols allow transparent fragmentation, but the fragments need to encode enough information for reconstruction, so you can still detect “less data received than encod
403.
by Veserv 1y ago
MTU discovery would be so much easier if the default behavior was truncate and forward when encountering a oversized packet. The endpoints can then just compare the bytes received against the size encoded inside of the packet to trivially d
404.
by Veserv 2y ago
You can do better than 2 bytes. Use the same epilogue, but store a copy of the "binary" just before the stack pointer and offset the instruction pointer from the start of the binary by 1 byte. If you use the binary consisting of l
405.
by Veserv 2y ago
NHTSA Report ID 13781-3470 in Florida, April 2022 is most likely the fatal motorcycle crash Tesla influencer Chuck Cook was involved in as mentioned in his video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8B0pX8TSOk In the vide
406.
by Veserv 2y ago
But Tesla Vision is, currently, legally below minimum human vision requirements and has historically been sold despite being nearly legally blind. Driving requirements in many states demand 20/40 vision in at least one eye [1]. 20&#x2F
407.
by Veserv 2y ago
That number is incidents successfully detected, not ground truth. Last I looked, the majority of recorded fatalities went undetected by Tesla telematics. That demonstrates their accident detection/reporting is empirically incapable o
408.
by Veserv 2y ago
The problem is that, as the article mentions, there are "good" forms of advertising that are actually meant to inform people. Unfortunately the overwhelming majority, and even more so in "high-end" advertising, is not th
409.
by Veserv 2y ago
It is a nuanced point. Certainly, you want to have a API that conforms to specifications and does not ruin your desired program invariants. But what if it does? What if you make a specification error? How do you modularize your specificatio
410.
by Veserv 2y ago
You made a strong claim which you have failed to support adequately and yet have continued to double down on. I did my research and presented my own interpretation which fundamentally disagrees with your interpretation. You have refused to
411.
by Veserv 2y ago
You do not appear to understand the difference between "necessary" and "sufficient". Process isolation is not sufficient (i.e. adequate on its own) to make a SQL server secure against maliciously crafted inputs intended
412.
by Veserv 2y ago
You keep dancing around the question of it being a memory corruption despite confidently asserting it as a clear, indisputable fact. Please support your claim by identifying the specific memory safety property that was violated and how it w
413.
by Veserv 2y ago
"process isolation is the bedrock of all other security guarantees" means process isolation is a necessary (in practice) condition, not a sufficient condition. "Tell me how process isolation prevents SQL injection." is a
414.
by Veserv 2y ago
Again, the nature of the bug has not been appropriately established. It appears to me to be a bug where a output register that the kernel is expected to write is written with a incorrect, but legal value in certain cases. If my interpretati
415.
by Veserv 2y ago
You can not just assert it is a memory corruption without explaining how it is a memory corruption. It appears to be a case where a wrong, but legal output is being stored. That does not, inherently, constitute a memory corruption. For exam
416.
by Veserv 2y ago
I do not see how that is a kernel memory corruption. I do not understand the code in context, but it appears to just be a case where the kernel incorrectly clobbered a userspace register which could result in incorrect userspace code execut
417.
by Veserv 2y ago
The cost of moving 4 KB is miniscule. Assume a anemic basic desktop with a 2 GHz clock and 2 instructions per clock. You would be able to issue 4 billion 8-byte stores per second resulting 32 GB/s or 32 bytes per nanosecond. Memory ban
418.
by Veserv 2y ago
What? You claim to have gotten a nearly 10 figure exit, yet you claim you made 450 k$ TC in your last job [1]. Even a maximally conservative estimate of 100,000,001 $ for a “nearly 10 figure exit” (being literally 1 dollar over 9 figures) w
419.
by Veserv 2y ago
I like to call that “unary thinking”. Nothing is “perfect”, therefore everything is “imperfect”, so everything is the “same”. One category for everything, unary.
420.
by Veserv 2y ago
Thank you for agreeing with me that “years experience in industry” has numerous examples both ways for efficacy and is thus insufficient support for snide assertions of fitness for position as the person I was responding to was making.

More ›