Ukv

16 ms·

211.
by Ukv 1y ago
Not certain which two things you're referring to by former/latter: "solve [data privacy] before [solving accessibility of LLM-based therapy tools]" : I agree - the former seems a more pressing issue and should be addres
212.
by Ukv 1y ago
Relevant RCT results I saw a while back seemed promising: https://ai.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/AIoa2400802 > can the patient use the AI therapist on their own devices and without any business looking at th
213.
by Ukv 1y ago
> > > Reasoning and consciousness are seperate(sic) concepts > No, they're not. But, in tech, we seem to have a culture of severing the humanities for utilitarian purposes [...] It's only meaningless if you don't
214.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Yes but there's no way for the OS to know if the focus request is legitimate, is there? Can't even say "browsers are allowed to grab focus" because [...] To my understanding, the approach described in the article is
215.
by Ukv 1y ago
I'd say no, for three reasons: 1. LLM philosophy can't really diverge from human philosophy with how models are run currently, since any insights/deductions are isolated to a single chat instance. Wouldn't be impossible
216.
by Ukv 1y ago
These are the malicious commits in question: https://github.com/aws/aws-toolkit-vscode/commit/678851b https://github.com/aws/aws-toolkit-vscode/commit/1294b38 Which were made u
217.
by Ukv 1y ago
An individual can end up dying - they'd experience themself seeing the wrong number, then committing suicide. There wouldn't be anything after that where an individual can "observe universes" with the ones where the wron
218.
by Ukv 1y ago
> If the many worlds interpretation is right, I should only observe universes in which I’be managed to conjure up your message faster than causality, right? I feel that's pairing MWI with some non-physical (or at least beyond the wa
219.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Why not instead remove 'panya' as a maintainer from legitimate packages that were unaffected? No recent or malicious versions of Stylus have been published (which generally is the case during a hijack) and no evidence that an
220.
by Ukv 1y ago
> mkdir and the Silent Error [...] While Gemini interpreted this as successful, the command almost certainly failed > When Gemini executed move * "..\anuraag_xyz project", the wildcard was expanded and each file was individu
221.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Yes, that proof is called a professional license, without that you are presumed guilty even if nothing goes wrong. A professional license is evidence against the offense of practicing without a license , and the burden of proof in suc
222.
by Ukv 1y ago
> > Would this guilty-until-proven-innocent rule apply also to non-ML code and manual decisions? > I would say yes [...] So if you're a doctor making manual decisions about how to treat a patient, and some harm/loss occur
223.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Something appropriate would be where if AI was used in a safety-critical or life-sustaining environment and harm or loss was caused; those who chose to use it are guilty until they prove they are innocent I think would be sufficient, n
224.
by Ukv 1y ago
Saving 4 characters (over "calls out") to fit within the HN submission title length limit, I'd assume.
225.
by Ukv 1y ago
Probably depends a lot of the type of questions you're asking. I think LLMs are inherently better at language-based tasks (translate this, reword this, alternate terms for this, etc.) than technical fact-based tasks, and within technic
226.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Yes it can. Fairly notably quite a lot of publishers sell their physical books and newspapers and require retailer unsold copies to be destroyed - but they were sold to the retailer. Issue is with A->B->C due to business B being
227.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Imagine you're an indie game studio developing an MMORPG To my understanding, this wouldn't affect MMORPGs where you're explicitly buying X months of access (so long as you do get the access you paid for, or a refund if
228.
by Ukv 1y ago
> The big difference here is that you’re applying B2C terms on B2B licenses. Both are cases of B2B licensing with the latter business then selling a product on to consumers. > This would essentially ban enterprise B2B licenses for vid
229.
by Ukv 1y ago
To my understanding the idea is that if a company licenses some 3rd-party component for their game, the component would either need to be severable from the game while still leaving it reasonably playable, or the license would need to permi
230.
by Ukv 1y ago
> That still makes wallhacks possible if standing close to a corner. That's what I'm thinking with the server-side behavior analysis to detect players seemingly using information their client was sent (in case they made a certa
231.
by Ukv 1y ago
> It would result in very slow shooters. Where you have to wait a bit to see what is around the corner after going there. Not that practical. I think ideally you'd send players only what they could possibly see before next the next
232.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Copyright was build to protect the artist from unauthorized copy by a human not by a machine (a machine wildly beyond their imagination at the time I mean), so the input and output limitations of humans were absolutely taken into accou
233.
by Ukv 1y ago
I don't think CaptainFever's point is that it's acceptable because it's legal, but rather that copyright law is what prevents them from, say, donating the originals instead of throwing them away.
234.
by Ukv 1y ago
(Later addendum: just noticed now that for some reason I had thought you were a different user to the initial comment I had replied to. The "so I don't think insane_dreamer's reasoning holds" was meant to refer to your p
235.
by Ukv 1y ago
> Only if you have domain knowledge [...] It's common to have a reasonable intuitive sense for whether something works as a birthday party yet be stumped when coming up with ideas. Or be able to see that a word ends in "um&quot
236.
by Ukv 1y ago
I don't think that's necessarily true - many tasks are difficult to solve but easy to verify. If I ask "place names that end with um", or "good ideas for a birthday party" I can pretty much verify the answer ju
237.
by Ukv 1y ago
> While a punishment in a deterministic universe can have a deterrence effect, it might not be the morally right thing to do. I feel whether it's the morally right thing to do depends on your ethical framework, not really whether th
238.
by Ukv 1y ago
> then punishing people for wrong doing doesn't make sense I think all that's needed for punishment to make sense is for that punishment to have a deterrence effect, reducing frequency of the targeted behavior. I'm not see
239.
by Ukv 1y ago
> they are trying to gaslight the general public into thinking that a deterministic world is compatible with moral responsibility To my understanding: 1. We have something that we've come to call moral responsibility. If I punch som
240.
by Ukv 1y ago
> It is journalistic malpractice that these viewpoints are presented as [...] Seems fine to me when it's explicitly stated to be the viewpoint of the OpenAI CEO, and then countered by an expert opinion. It's already apparent th

More ›