Ukv

27 ms·

391.
by Ukv 2y ago
> from what I understood, something like this shouldn't hold a drop of water under fair-use doctrine, because there's a disproportional damage, plus a huge monopolistic monetary gain "Something like this" as in what D
392.
by Ukv 2y ago
> and doing it anyway, and then lying about To my understanding, this is not true. The "Sky" voice was based on a real voice actor they had hired months before contacting Johansson, with the casting call not mentioning anything
393.
by Ukv 2y ago
> So, by scraping my webpages, they agree to my licensing of my data. If the fair use defense holds up, they didn't need a license to scrape your webpage. A contract should still apply if you only showed your content to people who&#
394.
by Ukv 2y ago
> If the magic values are some kind of microcode or firmware, or something else that is executed in some way, then no, it is not really open source. To my understanding, the contents of a .safetensors file is purely numerical weights - u
395.
by Ukv 2y ago
> We do still gave to define how we'd even measure humanity's position though, without that we don't have direction and can't know if we're getting closure or further away. What people fundamentally value will va
396.
by Ukv 2y ago
> The word is directional, it needs a goalpost to move towards [...] How do you define that goal post, and if we got there would you be happy to stop there? I'd claim you can in theory have a direction without an end-point - where e
397.
by Ukv 2y ago
May come down to philosophical differences - but I'd prefer humanity to continue progressing, curing diseases, learning about the Universe, improving quality of life, etc. as far as we can, as opposed to deciding at some point (or grad
398.
by Ukv 2y ago
An individual user's model usage is negligible, in that you should not feel bad about querying an LLM unless you feel approximately 1000 times worse about drinking a cup of coffee. But Google/Microsoft provide services for hundred
399.
by Ukv 2y ago
> what do you think has a bigger impact on someone’s quality of life: 1) operating a home or 2) generating AI images? [...] I would argue most people would weigh the convenience of a house a lot higher. To meaningfully compare directly l
400.
by Ukv 2y ago
Can't find where the A100 figure comes from, but an RTX 4090 can generate more than an image a second[0], which assuming constant power usage of 450W would be 0.000125kWh - compared to, say, 2.4kWh for a pot of coffee[1]. If you'r
401.
by Ukv 2y ago
I feel the no-numbers requirement essentially just boils down to replacing `num % 5 == 0` with `num.endswith(('0', '5', 'A'))` - or at least that's what I went with while playing along. Most of the complic
402.
by Ukv 2y ago
You may need to narrow your question. I think it's hard to deny at this point that there have been many proven outputs from the field of AI/deep learning - language translation, defect detection, OCR, weather forecasting, spam fil
403.
by Ukv 2y ago
> [...] 1000 times human intelligence, we are suddenly completely powerless [...] The liftoff conditions literally have to be near perfect. I don't consider models suddenly lifting off and acquiring 1000 times human intelligence to
404.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Regulators worldwide are keen to ensure that marketing and similar services are opt-in [...] but for some reason, forcing AI on customers is acceptable. [...] there needs to be a moratorium on adding AI services without first asking cu
405.
by Ukv 2y ago
Humans choose its loss function, then continue to guide it with finetuning/RL/etc.
406.
by Ukv 2y ago
> what inputs inside Google could cause this response My guess: Google's knowledge graph had references pointing to Joe Biden that, on inauguration, needed to be updated to Donald Trump so that answers to queries like "who is U
407.
by Ukv 2y ago
In the US, to my understanding: 1. The Copyright Office requires human authorship for a work to be protected by copyright. So in theory, someone else could copy the parts of your project that were LLM-generated without obeying your license&
408.
by Ukv 2y ago
To my knowledge there's no prerequisite for having comments seen. Your comments all seem to be marked as [dead] - I'd guess that you triggered an anti-spam measure due to some combination of: 1. Making 4 comments in quick successi
409.
by Ukv 2y ago
Seems like a logical target to rewrite in Rust given the obvious need for safety and performance. Hoping to see them succeed. The current C implementation of SQLite is likely already very safe in its unmodified form due to its extensive tes
410.
by Ukv 2y ago
> so if I can make ChatGPT output copyrighted material then Open AI should pay me correct? If by "make" you mean you're coaxing it into outputting your work, it'd be difficult to allege damages. If you show it's
411.
by Ukv 2y ago
> My second point, if you write a poem and I read it and memorize it, then publish it as my own with some slight changes you would be upset? I feel the problem with analogizing to humans while trying to make a point against unlicensed
412.
by Ukv 2y ago
> The article laments their removal as a tragedy I don't think the article calls it a tragedy - just removal of an option for users expressing themselves. Main concern is in what that move indicates of Meta's new position, IMO.
413.
by Ukv 2y ago
> If this gives your life meaning, you are worth ignoring. For someone to enjoy expressing themself with custom themes doesn't mean that custom themes are what gives their life meaning. > this policy is an admission of I think th
414.
by Ukv 2y ago
> there's no "use my tool" in this particular post, it's simply an observation There's a big "Try it!" for their error tracking software in the banner that follows you down the post. I don't think
415.
by Ukv 2y ago
To me, "using collective knowledge" is not mutually exclusive with writing novel code. Fundamentally I only know about a language's functions/keywords/types/... because I've read them in some documentation
416.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Imagine having to explain to a well-meaning visitor from another planet why using the phrase "people of color" is considered particularly enlightened, but saying "colored people" gets you fired. [...] There are no u
417.
by Ukv 2y ago
> Why that made up pronoun? Pedantically, all words are made up. I'd assume GP is using it because they see utility in a unambiguously-singular gender-nonspecific pronoun, opposed to the more widespread but somewhat ambiguous singul
418.
by Ukv 2y ago
It's not that this studio's work doesn't have value - but so did all the previous pieces that inspired this studio's work, and so did the Japanese designer's piece that was (plausibly) inspired by their work. I th
419.
by Ukv 2y ago
> I had financial expenses that I did not intend to have. I spent a lot of time doing research, analyzing drawings and different information. I did put an effort to protect my intellectual property and integrity of my original design. Ab
420.
by Ukv 2y ago
If the goal is to see "whether machine can pretend to be a woman better than a man can" as you previously stated, surely the machine's goal would be to imitate a woman as well as it can? Making it "not be too good"

More ›