UVB-76

45 ms·

451.
by UVB-76 13y ago
They're not saying it's meaningless , just that it's not going to have any direct impact.
452.
by UVB-76 13y ago
Nobody is pretending anything. It's the old DWP website. The DWP has a new home on gov.uk, which is much better, and is transitioning — actually rather quickly, given all the red tape that must be involved — to this new site as we speak. Th
453.
by UVB-76 13y ago
DWP are in the process of transitioning to their new gov.uk site. It's all well and good criticising their old website, but what do you propose they do about it? Transition to a new site? That's exactly what they're doing.
454.
by UVB-76 13y ago
Martin Naskovski?
455.
by UVB-76 13y ago
Stephen M Jones, is that you?
456.
by UVB-76 13y ago
As sad a state of affairs as it sounds, it makes sense. Protecting intellectual property is a costly business. If you're a business, you can stand to lose a lot of money through improper use of your intellectual property, hence it makes sen
457.
by UVB-76 13y ago
nic.io want to exploit the extension for profit, so obviously they will encourage wide usage, but ultimately what they have under their control is a ccTLD.
458.
by UVB-76 14y ago
If Internet access and a power outlet are what you need, pretty much any café or restaurant in any developed or developing country can take care of your needs these days.
459.
by UVB-76 14y ago
Yes. This is the future.
460.
by UVB-76 14y ago
If we're being pedantic, that's inductive reasoning. See the problem of induction [1]; you cannot justify any inference about future experiences of a product based on past experiences of it alone. Brand loyalty is broader and can potentiall