Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
UK-Al05
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
121.
▲
by
UK-Al05
4y ago
I think your definition of a machine is limited to simple mechanical devices. Machines are just physical systems that perform some work. This includes cells, biological systems etc If we built a human from scratch at atom level detail then
122.
▲
by
UK-Al05
4y ago
I think sensory input is required for self awareness. Given this machine had sensors for interacting with the world, and was capable of replicating the complicated structures in our brain then yes, it could become self aware given sufficien
123.
▲
by
UK-Al05
4y ago
If you state what you disagree with, people might understand where people differ better. Do you disagree with the idea that with knowledge and time humans have the potential create any material thing? If that's a reasonable thing to as
124.
▲
by
UK-Al05
4y ago
Less code and simple are not often related.
125.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
You'll find most successful founders are acutally 30+.
126.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Why would reflection break invariants? Most deserializers can pass through data into the constructor via reflection as well, where you can protect against invalid objects.
127.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Most typed languages it's like this var account = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Account>(string/stream) That's it. No inspection or looping through trees. You can often get it to create objects via constructor for valid
128.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I rarely have to think about deserialisation in c# or java either...
129.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Most deserializers in typed languages allow you to deserialize straight into structs or typed objects... Serde just doesn't use reflection to do it.
130.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I think in most ecosystems it's easier to use a prebuilt serializer/deserializer than your own format.
131.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
F# and .net core are completely open source. You don't need mono.
132.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
A broken build is meant to be everybody helps fix it situation.
133.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
You answered the question. You run as many tests as you can locally. Sometimes you can't, and the build goes red and you fix it with another commit.
134.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Sounds like your tests are to detail orientated. Tests should test a specific business goal. You know what the goal is before you write any tests right? Otherwise why are you writing any code?
135.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Because it's incredibly hard to do, and have some ideas to help.
136.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
That's branching. Trunk is when everyone direct push access to trunk.
137.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
That's a long time from pr to release.
138.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I think most people I see doing scrum these days, do a story, demo a story to owner, release story. Move onto next story. Rarely do they release at the end. The review at the end is for all stakeholders to be able to catch up on what's
139.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Juniors get less complicated and more well known tasks, but the effort involved is still high. Like digging a hole, everyone can do it, but its still hard.
140.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
When a employee moves jobs, hopefully there moving to a higher productivity job though. And the low productivity jobs go unfulfilled.
141.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
If its important why is it boring? Important implies that its going to have changes in design, changes in process which tends to mean its interesting for an engineer. I'd suggest its either interesting, your not well versed enough to
142.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I mean two of those are agile goals. Hitting a date by striping features, or a feature with fixed scope but no fixed date.
143.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Hypocrisy of the highest order. Complain about wealth inequality, while at the same time seek higher paid managerial jobs. Either your ok with wealth inequality, or start asking for salary to be spread around your team and sub teams. I'
144.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
The philosophy of the Economist magazine could be defined as liberalism. So they're probably hyper sensitive anti liberal ideas.
145.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I wouldn't say they're opposite. But I would say they're ok in abandoning liberal ideals in order achieve their goals. I.E Mob justice, "positive" discrimination, silence is violence, ostracization of people who dar
146.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I'm gay, and I have no idea what you seeing in this thread to see you react like this. I saw the odd comment, but theyve got lots of counter arguments.
147.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
I mean critical theories critique liberalism. So it's not just a few people. The movements intellectual basis has a critique of liberalism at its core.
148.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
'Woke' is illiberal. A lot of the ideas behind it attack liberalism as they see at enabling the status quo as opposed to action for change. Edit: Why are people down voting me? Critical theories are very open about their critique
149.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
It's either intersectionality or Russia? What about old liberal ideals?
150.
▲
by
UK-Al05
5y ago
Being good at making clear, useful and simple abstractions. Although not the only way being good at this, mathematical thinking helps. What information can I discard, what's important, what isn't important? The problem is you can
More ›