Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
UK-AL
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
71 ms
·
751.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
I would still expect every single EU regulation to be in place tbh. I've heard that all EU laws will remain in place unless explicitly removed
752.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
So Germany will risk 1\5 of German car workers because it wants to send a message?
753.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
But why risk losses at all if you can avoid it?
754.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
From Japan, china,America, domestic, any common wealth country? Europe will not disadvantage themselves with tarrifs and risk job losses
755.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Doesn't matter who needs more who. The best deal for both is low tarrifs. There's no conflicting interest here. Tarrifs = more jobs losses for both No tarrifs = fewer job losses
756.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Except the German economy is driven by cars. We import 1/5 of all German cars.
757.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
That's what the EU was meant to be. But it isn't
758.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
I don't understand. If they don't want job losses, they have to trade with us. I'm expecting most EU countries wanting avoid as many job losses as possible. Doesn't really matter who's got the most leverage. The opt
759.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Think that would politically difficult at the cost of many of jobs.
760.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Globalism still means there could be countries. But borders will mean less.
761.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
That would cost them tons of jobs to do that.
762.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Not really. Because it will be tit for tat strategy. In order to not get job losses, both have to cooperate
763.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Out of spite? Refusing to neogiate decent trade deals would mean tons of job losses for Germany and France.
764.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
The markets are mostly reacting to the uncertainty this creates, rather than judgement if this was good or bad in the long term. Nobody knows the future status of the uk. If we get good deals expect the markets to recover in a couple of yea
765.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
UK importing tons of good from EU means that the uk is generating a lot of jobs for EU countries.
766.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
And then we place tarrifs on all French goods. French know this will happen, so they don't do that.
767.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Most people on leave campaign have said most EU nationals already here are not going to be kicked out? I think immigration levels won't be effected.
768.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
That's whats so special about it. It's fast paced, highly tuned, simple monster shooter that relies on speed and dodging. There aren't that many games like that any more. They focus on other things.
769.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
The fact Microsoft gets money from their customers, makes them extremely interested in making software that's a very good fit for business and end users. Linux other hand is very good for developers, sysadmins and technical people. Thi
770.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
You are being so aggressive. The fact that you are assuming your answers are right, when in reality no one has certain answers. I could point out 1000 books pointing out the opposite. Are you refusing learn and to open your mind to other po
771.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
There's tons of philosophy on what is a basic right and what is not. They can convey the ideas better than I can.
772.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
And I could give you plenty of books arguing the opposite. This is isn't a solved argument. I'm well read around economics. Most of solutions involve government intervention, which involves blind faith in the state as well as the
773.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
You forget there is a division of labour. There is no lump of skilled labour. You can have tons of skilled labour, yet still have shortages in lots of different areas. Combine that with a higher overall demand. Overall it is productivity th
774.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Nearly every country that has strong employment laws has higher levels of unemployment. You can argue all day about the possibilities. But empirically this is nearly always the case. I'm a pragmatist so I always what go for what is pro
775.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
All these means is that your moving your ultimate trust from one set of people to a different set of people further up the chain. Both could be horrible dictators.
776.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
His not infringing on anybody if its mutely agreed contract. The solution for his issue is to find a way further up the value chain. Almost any government intervention which attempts to help him will have a hidden side effect.
777.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Switzerland has one the best quality of life indices. Just becoming as good as Switzerland would be a massive accomplishment.
778.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
I'm not against government in total. Government should enforce basic rights for individuals. Beyond that it becomes dubious.
779.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Yes, because this can be logically reasoned as a basic right. It's when it starts going further(which the eu has) is when it becomes a problem.
780.
▲
by
UK-AL
10y ago
Specifically my moral values are anything is allowed, as long as it doesn't hurt or infringe on other peoples rights.
More ›