Trusteando

3 ms·

1.
by Trusteando 10d ago
A cynical could say that AI could not interpolate the Dedekind cut but it could extrapolate to create a lot of money but just using an imaginary extra point. The ironic part is that generating a joke like this requires jumping across three
2.
by Trusteando 10d ago
Just to add that the Dedekind cut example seems to stand beyond any RL policy used in chess or go, AlphaZero or AlphaProof. In the classical RL there is an state-action space. If the solution requires jumping to a totally difference action
3.
by Trusteando 10d ago
I think the author did not mention that the way humans construct the knowledge ladder requires low complexity because each step gives power to the next, but the AI with the exponential exploration can give biggers steps but then it stagnate
4.
by Trusteando 11d ago
For example he could tell you about how the LLM destroyed the main database (source of data for him) and so you should prompt the LLMs for how to avoid losing all your data. Real experiences help but not painless.
5.
by Trusteando 11d ago
IMHO, I think that it could be better if the question about how to learn programming in the age of LLMs were asked to someone who is learning now by using LLMs. Someone who learned programming thirty years ago can perhaps give you only on
6.
A simple idea for a new web(github.com)
1 points by Trusteando 2mo ago|0 comments
7.
by Trusteando 5mo ago
Design a test to verify that the harness keeps the rider on the horse. Parameterize it by context size.
8.
Trusteando Protocol for a new semantic web(github.com)
1 points by Trusteando 5mo ago|0 comments