Toynbeeidea

4 ms·

1.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
No, because he was removed at gunpoint (no, not the one he pointed at himself). Unless and until that happens to a US President, you can expect more of the same.
2.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
>That day I sent six complaints about Anthropic, the maker of Claude, to 107 recipients. So a spammer spammed and got his just deserts. Good.
3.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
Sure, good plan. I'll just walk into thr local CVS to buy a gift card and... oh, wait, no. Exact same issue.
4.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
It works to buy darknet drugs, sure. Wake me up when I can go to the grocery store and buy some peaches. "Don't worry, cashier-bro, the transaction will only take 20 minutes to go through, trust me!"
5.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
"Muh boy didn't shoot that man, the gun did!"
6.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
Hate to have to be that guy, but, ACKSHULLY, you already do launch the missiles in Missile Command. That's literally the entire game, in fact, launching missiles to intercept other missiles.
7.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
How can AI do either of those things?
8.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
The same incentive there always was: Because you wanna know. What incentive were you thinking of?
9.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
No.
10.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
>If the recurrence step is no longer in English, we can no longer monitor intent, and can only observe whether a model is safe through behavior. So, you mean, like another human person?
11.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
True. And yet the possibility exists that one COULD. That's the difference.
12.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
He is.
13.
by Toynbeeidea 2mo ago
>Closed source doesn't mean not trustworthy Yes, it does. >O&O has been making tools like these for a long time. Microsoft has made Windows for a long time. Longer, even.