Toynbeeidea

2 ms·

1.
by Toynbeeidea 10d ago
No, because he was removed at gunpoint (no, not the one he pointed at himself). Unless and until that happens to a US President, you can expect more of the same.
2.
by Toynbeeidea 11d ago
>That day I sent six complaints about Anthropic, the maker of Claude, to 107 recipients. So a spammer spammed and got his just deserts. Good.
3.
by Toynbeeidea 12d ago
Sure, good plan. I'll just walk into thr local CVS to buy a gift card and... oh, wait, no. Exact same issue.
4.
by Toynbeeidea 12d ago
It works to buy darknet drugs, sure. Wake me up when I can go to the grocery store and buy some peaches. "Don't worry, cashier-bro, the transaction will only take 20 minutes to go through, trust me!"
5.
by Toynbeeidea 12d ago
"Muh boy didn't shoot that man, the gun did!"
6.
by Toynbeeidea 12d ago
Hate to have to be that guy, but, ACKSHULLY, you already do launch the missiles in Missile Command. That's literally the entire game, in fact, launching missiles to intercept other missiles.
7.
by Toynbeeidea 14d ago
How can AI do either of those things?
8.
by Toynbeeidea 15d ago
The same incentive there always was: Because you wanna know. What incentive were you thinking of?
9.
by Toynbeeidea 15d ago
No.
10.
by Toynbeeidea 20d ago
>If the recurrence step is no longer in English, we can no longer monitor intent, and can only observe whether a model is safe through behavior. So, you mean, like another human person?
11.
by Toynbeeidea 22d ago
True. And yet the possibility exists that one COULD. That's the difference.
12.
by Toynbeeidea 22d ago
He is.
13.
by Toynbeeidea 22d ago
>Closed source doesn't mean not trustworthy Yes, it does. >O&O has been making tools like these for a long time. Microsoft has made Windows for a long time. Longer, even.