TotesAThrowAway

4 ms·

1.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
More like this minus the electronics:- http://www.lasersnake.co.uk/images/galleries/2b8q6hcombined-... Your idea would be perfect if we were just doing an inspection, however we have other work we will need to do
2.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
The alternative and what is most commonly used for control, in the nuclear industry, is a very long 'umbilical' (wire with loads of cores). A lot of nuclear providers are against people using wireless as if you lose connectivity a
3.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
^that.
4.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
That should read 'was happening' sorry. I was in a rush and didn't proof read properly.
5.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
PART 2 So, ROVs. We probably aren't going to use a ROV for our solution as it doesn't suit and they're a pain in the arse quite frankly. To start, I'll address the issue with the 'wires' failing. An American co
6.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
The quarter rig (imagine cutting a 90 degree cross section out of the reactor and plonking it into a rig hall) we made was for a remote solution we did for EDF for some of the nuclear fleet in the UK. As much as it would have been fun to ma
7.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
I should probably also mention there's 6 reactors on site, 4, 5 and 6 were relatively unharmed by the tsunami and 5 and 6 could actually be turned back on. However for obvious reasons they have been decommissioned and wont be turned on
8.
by TotesAThrowAway 11y ago
Friend of BillinghamJ here. We do build mock facilities and we have recently started working on the Fukushima Daiichi inspections, and there is only so much I can actually say but I'll share what I can. I'll explain what caused th