TotempaaltJ

11 ms·

91.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
That still doesn't justify the hostile interpretation of the original comment. You could've phrased it differently... Anyway, even if it is that line of thinking, I can totally see how people would see some sort of boundary betwee
92.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
This seems like a very hostile reading of GP's comment... GP never said they eat pig (for all we know they might be vegan), and it's acknowledged that it's an irrational feeling. It doesn't really make sense to then chal
93.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
Just a vacuum chamber: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMCJGfwj3rY
94.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
It seems reasonable to me that a small but not insignificant market could emerge around providing convenience for this.
95.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
> I feel if it's legal it might be harder to punish those that do. Or it could be easier because it becomes regulated and controlled?
96.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
"you might be" does not mean "you are"
97.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
I found that no, that's not the case at all. I'm very relaxed now that I'm finally back in an office. I was very stressed working from home.
98.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
And if you do decide to do single-commit massive style changes, add the commits to an ignore revs file: http://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config....
99.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
In isolation, yes, but when you're actually using this sentence there will be context. "When you want to onboard a new developer, they will require access." "There's a new person joining the team." "What d
100.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
A simpler explanation would be "pee-lover".
101.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
I think OP is saying they're testing to see if they have COVID now. Hoping not to be reinfected.
102.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
This is just a list of notable women. It's not really "excluding men" as much as it is just a different category.
103.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
Natural gas has its own issues https://www.theverge.com/2021/5/6/22422824/natural-gas-infra...
104.
by TotempaaltJ 5y ago
The government, I suppose
105.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I don't think anything about this article implies that there's no non-tech way to utilize these services after this change. Most governments have laws banning that anyway. A quick browse of boston.gov shows at least all forms I co
106.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
Does anyone have any thoughts on self-hosting https://sourcehut.org/ ? It seems like a very interesting option to me
107.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
There's a difference between highlighting the mental health aspects and classifying something as a mental illness. The first can be done safely, the second is harmful.
108.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
Seems like this could work super well for personal use, especially if there was a mobile/tablet app with pinch-to-zoom. Could throw a party on this with my friends.
109.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I'm pretty certain this has nothing to do with pressure. The risks profile is very different, and for the same reason my trials aren't run on pregnant women. It hardly makes sense (and would be immoral) to include people in a clin
110.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I think the reason is the discrepancy between what you're saying (which is true) and reality: > sometimes you have to represent 'nothing.' Languages in which all values can /also/ be null break the "sometime
111.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I think we'll see a lot of approximations of it. Autonomous taxis in predefined spaces (see Cruise, Waymo), trucks on highways (maybe changing to human drivers when entering/nearing cities). But no safe full self-driving for a whi
112.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
IKEA has been investing in sustainability for longer than most companies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA#Environmental_performance I guess it's easier to do good without shareholders.
113.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I've always heard that nation state actors will get access to your devices if they want to, and there's basically nothing any individual user or company can do about it. Using known or unknown exploits, the assumption is that if t
114.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
This is the commonly accepted definition of carbon neutral.
115.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
This homepage doesn't do a great job at communicating this.
116.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I think this is incorrect. It looks like it's intending to be a set of libraries or protocols(?) to support development in the distributed web. > Spritely consists of a number of modular components bringing new and rich features, fr
117.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I just started using Bazel this weekend for a personal (Rust) project. I understood the concepts which convinced me it was something I wanted to use. The documentation and tutorials definitely make the learning curve steeper than I think it
118.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
Or the method of teaching it is broken.
119.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
I don't know that that's gonna be enough for Sweeney at this point.
120.
by TotempaaltJ 6y ago
> would guess they're more likely to get rid of "apps" entirely than open up their ecosystem. You believe they'd rather give up the iPhone than compromise on a more consumer-friendly ecosystem policy?

More ›