TopologyDough

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by TopologyDough 10y ago

   This is a definition question. Mathematically negative numbers are not whole numbers. This information is of little value without context though.
2. 2.▲
   by TopologyDough 10y ago

   The link misinterprets FTA.
3. 3.▲
   by TopologyDough 10y ago

   I miss quoted the original blog by replacing "has" for "can" and such. But the second sentence of what you quoted is misleading because that's not an correct interpretation of FTA.
4. 4.▲
   by TopologyDough 10y ago

   https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://... note that prime factorization is unique up to order. We aren't talking about order when we use the term uniqueness.
5. 5.▲
   by TopologyDough 10y ago

   "The fundamental theorem of arithmetic can be approximately interpreted 3 * 5 * 13 and 3 * 13 * 5" - this is false. The fundamental theorem of arithmetic "can be more approximately interpreted as " 195 has one prime fact