Topfi

14 ms·

241.
by Topfi 4mo ago
> Claude Opus 4.7, for example, had training that focused on business skills and robustness against adversarial agents, but we discovered that this training inadvertently contributed to misaligned behavior including dishonesty. We theref
242.
by Topfi 5mo ago
> Obviously during the interview I was like oh JIRA yeah yeah yeah you still use that? I can use that. Hold up, did I miss something? Fall into a time hole? Why are we talking about Jira like it’s Visicalc? Not currently working for an I
243.
by Topfi 5mo ago
It is always great fun using a model via API without search/web access and quoting a recent development, being told that it must be hamfisted satire, then providing access. The reasoning traces are a delight, Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4 durin
244.
What Sudoku Reveals About AI Reasoning Architectures and the Future(logicalintelligence.com)
1 points by Topfi 5mo ago|0 comments
245.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Don't know why you were initially downed (maybe some thought you were an impersonator), so vouched for your comment. Happy to see you on here and great to hear that you'll address this. As mentioned in my comment, data export let&
246.
by Topfi 5mo ago
WP was incredibly smooth and they were willing to reinvent UX from first principles in ways that'll to this day make me reach for Sailfish OS if I didn't need physical buttons, but I must bring up the desktop version of Windows f
247.
by Topfi 5mo ago
It is still there and you may get it easily. If you export your data [0] all your Claude Design chats are in a design_chats directory along with the code, even if your account currently has no access to Claude Design. It is .json, but conve
248.
by Topfi 5mo ago
But they had no access control in the first place. If I built their repo without modifications, I automatically have access. I would need to make modifications not to get that access. > [...] they can still refuse you access to their net
249.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Yes, what about it?
250.
by Topfi 5mo ago
If I just build the software from their repo without any modifications, getting an identical result to what I can download via their website, would I be allowed to use the service? If not, why not? If yes, what if I made a modification? How
251.
by Topfi 5mo ago
If I build their slicer, not modifying any line of code, then accessed using that binary, would that be acceptable? If not, why not, considering it is identical to what is on their website? If I made any changes prior to building, would it
252.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Never thought of it, but conceptually, I could see the appeal for very privacy minded folks and those with heightened security requirements. Course, it's a question of thread profile whether one trusts Google and case dependent whether
253.
by Topfi 5mo ago
> ChromeOS ships an optimized, platform-specific kernel, built using LLVM with LTO and AutoFDO. Ok. How significant is the difference they gain from that? If this yields such major gains, there must be benchmarks showcasing it. At the sa
254.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Something I just thought of under the shower: A user can build the slicer from scratch and the UA is public on their repo [0]. If one is determined to do so, using the same deps, pinning the date, etc., they could create a deterministic bui
255.
Hey Bambu Lab: come sue us [video](youtube.com)
5 points by Topfi 5mo ago|1 comments
256.
by Topfi 5mo ago
> ChromeOS has better security and performance than Ubuntu [...] I'm going to need a citation on that, especially performance. Doubly so if Crostini is put into the mix. > [...] updates things like peripheral firmware that Ubuntu
257.
by Topfi 5mo ago
No, ChromeOS cannot. You can only run Linux applications via Crostini. Heavily sandboxed and restricted to limited hardware access, that is not software compatible by any reasonable measure. If that counts, my MacBook is compatible with all
258.
by Topfi 5mo ago
I have a hard time seeing how any Chromebook above $ 349,- could still survive in an post-MacBook Neo age. Say what you want, a cheap Windows laptop at least has an edge on obscure software compatibility over MacOS and a notebook running an
259.
We're still talking about the Trump phone(theverge.com)
7 points by Topfi 5mo ago|0 comments
260.
by Topfi 5mo ago
If diluting your stock is a magical infinite money glitch, why doesn't Cohen just buy Nvidia? Heck, I think GOOG is now the most valuable, why not both? Throw TSLA in while you are at it and AMZN, I am sure there is some synergistic po
261.
by Topfi 5mo ago
> [...] all 173 of them [...] Somehow, the real number is even funnier...
262.
by Topfi 5mo ago
I checked and in that case [0] specifically, the court specifically doubted that such access was violating any applicable laws. Course, it got vacated before that could be properly addressed and this seems to be specific to NJ so if someone
263.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Thanks, would have been surprised, was mainly asking because OP was mentioning legal concerns. This may be a case for their EULA, sure, but I would have been surprised if there was any legal precedent or grounding for such a statement.
264.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Any instance anywhere that a court has considered an UA sufficient for access control? Especially one published under a copyleft license?
265.
by Topfi 5mo ago
A User Agent not being suitable for any kind of authorisation aside, given this was published under AGPL, is any kind of legal action even possible? Or is this like DMCA abuse, technically not grounded in any legal basis (and in the case of
266.
Setting the record straight on Cloud Access and Community(blog.bambulab.com)
3 points by Topfi 5mo ago|1 comments
267.
Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist (1980)(articles.adsabs.harvard.edu)
5 points by Topfi 5mo ago|3 comments
268.
by Topfi 5mo ago
Title was slightly editorialized by adding the word "AI" to get the point across.
269.
AI Coding plan comparisons based on actual usage(sites.diy)
4 points by Topfi 5mo ago|1 comments
270.
by Topfi 5mo ago
> Bing AI - Acquired by Microsoft. > Microsoft's Bing search engine with AI-enhanced features The product has since been folded into Microsoft; visitors to the original URL are now redirected to copilot.microsoft.com. What? Besid

More ›