Tobani

14 ms·

91.
by Tobani 11y ago
It could be more non-go files in the go repos throwing off the numbers?
92.
by Tobani 11y ago
The parser finds the start/end of sub-structures and doesn't necessarily process them all. So for large structures of which you only need a subset, you're only doing the work you need to do. For a large structure in which y
93.
by Tobani 11y ago
If the server can parse served html, it could preemptively also send along other required assets (css, images, etc) before the client has time to parse and request them. This would help remove necessity for optimizations like image bundlin
94.
by Tobani 11y ago
To be fair the " Acupuncturists, chiropractors [...]" have to learn to sell themselves, and market themeselves because people are more likely to be paying out-of-pocket for the services. If people have a bad experience they won&#
95.
by Tobani 11y ago
I have seen it before and it is pretty amazing. My comment was mostly in context of the 2003 message. People are finding more and more clever ways of handling this all the time. Par(at least monad-par on hackage) seems to have come aroun
96.
by Tobani 11y ago
To be fair I think the same is true of procedural languages. Parallel computation often requires some sort of coordination mechanism, and there are more failure modes. Functional languages often lend them selves to elegant mathematic-look
97.
by Tobani 11y ago
Yeah its funny how alumni play the a role in the tech that gets used. I know that there was a lot of Xilinx in use on campus. I didn't do anything with FPGAs outside of the one class so I wondered how much of that was based on techni
98.
by Tobani 11y ago
I know in our Computer Architecture class we designed a MIPS-like processor. I don't remember what software we used, but we ran it in simulation and imaged it on to an FPGA board at the end of class. We learned how to build all the c
99.
by Tobani 11y ago
> TCL has been battle-tested for decades, even in industrial automation... Right but I believe the point was that this http implementation was less battle-tested than node's and that if you're willing to strip away features fr
100.
by Tobani 11y ago
As far as we know only on insecure channels. Google had "private" pipes that they thought they didn't need to encrypt between datacenters and they didn't think they needed to encrypt that data. That was the MITM we kn
101.
by Tobani 11y ago
As a publicly traded company they are required to be concerned with shareholder value. These pet projects may not increase shareholder value in direct or obvious ways and there is a limit to the amount they can spend on unprofitable ende
102.
by Tobani 11y ago
Why would FIFA's bylaws have anything to do with a criminal investigation?
103.
by Tobani 11y ago
Could be. I haven't done it in a while. Diapers are weird though, some kinds only go up to size 2, then you have to switch to a different kind and its not really just changing sizes.
104.
by Tobani 11y ago
You just cancel the subscription and start a new one on the larger size.
105.
by Tobani 11y ago
I think this is basically the case. Here in indianapolis there is a local Amazon warehouse and I got notification that this service is now available. I think they've been working on this for a while w/ various strategies. For ex
106.
by Tobani 11y ago
> IE11 is an evergreen browser with constant improvement. Until Spartan comes out? > There won't be another IE. There will be Spartan. So we're going to be stuck supporting IE11 long after "Spartan" has taken hold
107.
by Tobani 11y ago
Chrome doesn't come preinstalled on any OS that I know of. So you're suggesting that users think that they, "Used google to download google so they could do searches on google?"
108.
by Tobani 12y ago
IE11 was fairly modern when it came out. It will likely be legacy long before IE12 or whatever they decide to call it comes out. They're not really going to be able to play keep up until they divorce the browser from the OS. Given t
109.
by Tobani 12y ago
I get what you're saying. I'm just saying philosophically if you're going to say it is pass-by-pointer w/ castrated pointers is that any different than pass-by-reference with castrated references? To blur the lines: If e
110.
by Tobani 12y ago
Except x could be an array
111.
by Tobani 12y ago
my cpp foo is much out of date admittedly. I believe my comment explicilty deals with its parent comment. I believe your example you are setting the contents of a specific memory address. This is nonsensical in a java context. Again a
112.
by Tobani 12y ago
> What do you think is going on here? I think you're adding code that doesn't address my point. This is pointer manipulation, not function call semantics. If you have raw pointers you can do a lot of magic. I think your co
113.
by Tobani 12y ago
So would you assert this is not pass-by-reference? void f(const Foo& x){ ... } My point is the semantics don't map 1:1. If you're going to say Java's references are pointers with different semantics how
114.
by Tobani 12y ago
Actually it is somewhere between the last two. I cant do pointer math but i can pass a null reference.
115.
by Tobani 12y ago
I think this is the big thing. Maybe java references arent cpp refs. Is there a proper name for an abstract construct that refers to something else? Maybe reference?
116.
by Tobani 12y ago
There are no claims that Java doesn't use pointers. You just don't have direct access to them. Also i don't. Think the entire purpose was to hide pointers for correctness sake but to make the memory model consistent across
117.
by Tobani 12y ago
Interesting about kiln. My interpretation was: 1) Rant about a problem specific to you... 2) Provide no meaningful guidance or solution... (Except move back to SVN to solve a problem I don't have) 3) Make it to the top of Hacker News
118.
by Tobani 12y ago
It may work well enough.
119.
by Tobani 12y ago
Except cloudflare doesnt give away a private key that can allow any arbitrary person to do this for any arbitrary site with little effort on affected machines.
120.
by Tobani 12y ago
The "Right to be forgotten" thing is murky too. If I lost to you in a competition and I"m deeply offended/embarrassed by this, is it within my right to remove your victories from the internet? Why have the people inde

More ›