ToValueFunfetti

4 ms·

1.
by ToValueFunfetti 6d ago
The HuggingFace hacks did also target OpenAI servers. See "OpenAI Itself Was Hacked" in here: https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-report-says-its-netw...
2.
by ToValueFunfetti 10d ago
It's more like if the law says the maximum sentence for theft is 10 years, a thief appeals his 20 year sentence, wins, and gets out early. He goes and robs somebody else so you say the court was wrong to let him win. The court's j
3.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
I'm confused by this. Are you saying that everything related to the right wing and fox news is evidence that momentum is a good model or that trying to model history with momentum is fundamentally fallacious? If the former, you've
4.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
Hmm, yes, I see that and that the person I was responding to is getting read the same way, but not clear why that's the case. We're both in this conversation under [1]. The sports issue is the one that's 90/10 [2], while
5.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
Why am I being interpreted as advocating for abandoning the trans? I don't want to do that and I don't need to be convinced by my empathy for gays or blacks- I care about trans people themselves! I'm saying if an issue doesn&
6.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
Is there a reason to believe this is how things work? Rather than "within a democracy as long as 'trans rights' means something that most people disagree with, it will be harder to advance the pro- side of the issue"? Is
7.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
But this is not throwing millions of people under the bus. At least according to this thread, there are fewer trans women in sports than bills stopping them. If this issue does represent throwing literally millions of people under the bus-
8.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
Yeah, I don't get this. If they're niche irrelevant issues that affect ~nobody, why not just concede them? Republicans could hardly dominate the discourse with these topics if there was nobody to discourse against.
9.
by ToValueFunfetti 11d ago
If I have something you want and I could give it to you but instead charge you money, is that malice? If so, what system wouldn't make malice indistinguishable from business decisions? If not, what distinguishes that from a login wall
10.
by ToValueFunfetti 13d ago
I don't follow. If I'm a biologist interested in studying life, I can't study rhododendra and ignore the rest. I'd learn almost nothing about locomotion, digestion, sexual reproduction, et cetera. But that doesn't t
11.
by ToValueFunfetti 13d ago
Hmm, I guess what I mean is- is there an empirical difference between how a model of intelligence is limited and how a model of language is? Something I can evaluate in a year and say "Oh, the evidence still points to the latter"
12.
by ToValueFunfetti 13d ago
If a thin model of language can write poetry, perform arithmetic, perform logical reasoning, develop software, play chess, beat factorio, identify and exploit novel security issues, and solve millenium prize problems, what is the purpose of
13.
by ToValueFunfetti 13d ago
"Recursive self-improvement"- models making better models
14.
by ToValueFunfetti 14d ago
Did you respond to the wrong comment?
15.
by ToValueFunfetti 15d ago
Are you kidding? They've been asking for regulation for years! Altman testified to the Senate in 2023. HN loves calling this hype, eg. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36034314 . They just put this out two days ago:
16.
by ToValueFunfetti 19d ago
What does the one have to do with the other? If I tell you I committed a crime and an independent investigator tells you I committed a crime, why would you need to know my income and outlays to decide whether I can commit crimes?
17.
by ToValueFunfetti 21d ago
This has happened: https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/14576
18.
by ToValueFunfetti 23d ago
What does verbal violence mean non-hyperbolically to you? >Verbal abuse (also known as [...] verbal violence [...]) is a type of psychological abuse that involves the use of oral or written language directed to a victim. Verbal abuse can
19.
by ToValueFunfetti 1mo ago
>even invents concerns to downplay as if Jasmine had reported on them. In particular, you said that noise is a non-issue – that's not discussed at all in the interview (CMD+F "noise" – zero results). Huh? How about CMD+F o
20.
by ToValueFunfetti 1mo ago
I read that comment as well at the time and was taken aback. After such a lengthy discussion where Jasmine went and talked to the people doing the disagreeing over multiple weeks and reported her findings, Rachel replies that no, this is wr
21.
by ToValueFunfetti 1mo ago
Just read this interview[1] the other day that contends that the blue collar workers, or at least their union leaders, are thrilled about the data center boom. There are loads of these projects underway and they show no sign of stopping, so
22.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
I appreciate the admission. Please try to participate productively in the future.
23.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
This has nothing to do with agreement with the crowd, and it's not a matter of difference of opinion between us. There are guidelines here[1] that are not being met. A conscious effort was made to prevent this site from being an echo c
24.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
If your response to an argument is inb4, you don't get to tell somebody else they're not putting in enough effort to provide substance. Also, I brought up race dynamics before your inb4, so even if anticipation counted as more tha
25.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
People directly criticize LLM code generators all the time on this site. It's all over the place. You are almost certainly being routinely banned because you write low-effort comments that violate the site guidelines and negatively imp
26.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
As a guy who presumably has a lot less experience in security than you, I feel rude even bringing it up: surely you're aware of red teaming? This isn't a novel technique invented for AI- IBM has a page about it, it's what all
27.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
The companies are begging to be regulated for this reason and have been doing so for years. HN's response is generally that this is performative for marketing or seeking regulatory capture or haha anthropic you get what you ask for. Ma
28.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
Is this new behavior from them? I haven't looked at their free chat offering in a minute, but I thought they always had them close behind paid tier, often with essentially equal products that made it weird for them to sell the paid tie
29.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
You can't use that meme argument at the beginning and mention that it is perfectly possible to boycott the other company at the end. The whole point of the meme is that participating in society is unavoidable, right? And I don't t
30.
by ToValueFunfetti 2mo ago
This notion that legislatures are blind to the number of jobs that will be created is contradicted by your previous link. You can scroll through table 2 for this- Alabama expects 20 jobs, Georgia 5-25, Nevada 10, etc. These states don'

More ›